1978
DOI: 10.1128/jb.134.2.381-388.1978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viability and Endogenous Substrates Used During Starvation Survival of Rhodospirillum rubrum

Abstract: Cells of Rhodospirillum rubrum were grown photoorganotrophically and chemoorganotrophically and then starved for organic carbon and combined nitrogen under four conditions: anaerobically in the light and dark and aerobically in the light and dark. Illumination prolonged viability and suppressed the net degradation of cell material of phototrophically grown cells, but had no effect on chemotrophically grown cells that did not contain bacteriochlorophyll. The halflife survival times of carbohydrate-rich phototro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ATP content significantly increased to (12.9 ± 0.87) × 10 −16 mol CFU −1 and decreased to (4.06 ± 0.45) × 10 −16 mol CFU −1 after 1-d anaerobic starvation in the light and the dark, respectively. As suggested previously [ 23 , 28 ], ATP is probably consumed to maintain viability even under carbon starvation conditions, but in the case of this bacterium ATP can be photosynthetically produced in the light. When aerobic dark conditions were applied after growth termination, the 1-d aerobic starved cells showed high ATP contents, (7.49 ± 0.11) × 10 −16 mol CFU −1 , in contrast to the anaerobic starved cells in the dark.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ATP content significantly increased to (12.9 ± 0.87) × 10 −16 mol CFU −1 and decreased to (4.06 ± 0.45) × 10 −16 mol CFU −1 after 1-d anaerobic starvation in the light and the dark, respectively. As suggested previously [ 23 , 28 ], ATP is probably consumed to maintain viability even under carbon starvation conditions, but in the case of this bacterium ATP can be photosynthetically produced in the light. When aerobic dark conditions were applied after growth termination, the 1-d aerobic starved cells showed high ATP contents, (7.49 ± 0.11) × 10 −16 mol CFU −1 , in contrast to the anaerobic starved cells in the dark.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Purple photosynthetic bacteria are able to convert light energy to ATP by anoxygenic cyclic photophosphorylation. It has been reported that illumination prolongs the viability of purple photosynthetic bacteria [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. In addition, Kanno et al previously examined ATP contents in purple photosynthetic bacteria, Rhodopseudomonas palustris and Rhodospirillum rubrum , under carbon-starved conditions and reported that illumination largely affected the maintenance of cellular ATP contents under carbon-starved conditions [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during anaerobic starvation in the presence of light viability was maintained at a relatively high level for a much longer period of time. This is not unexpected in view of the fact that in this organism the presence of light may act as a source of energy for maintenance purposes in the absence of an external growth substrate [46]. The presence of light also resulted in a significantly increased level of total RNA in phototrophically grown cells of R. palustris compared with cells grown aerobically in the dark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although the reason underlying the loss of viability is unknown, these results suggest that the interactions between bacteria and amoebae are stably maintained and that the survival of bacterial endosymbionts are dependent on amoebae, possibly for the acquirement of energy and for protection against environmental stresses. Our phylogenic analysis confirmed that endosymbiont eS31 was most related to Trojanella sp., which belongs to the family Rhodospirillaceae , which are phototrophic bacteria (Breznak et al. , 1978).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stably maintained and that the survival of bacterial endosymbionts are dependent on amoebae, possibly for the acquirement of energy and for protection against environmental stresses. Our phylogenic analysis confirmed that endosymbiont eS31 was most related to Trojanella sp., which belongs to the family Rhodospirillaceae, which are phototrophic bacteria (Breznak et al, 1978). Unique properties, such as this may be associated with the rapid loss of eS31 viability immediately after being drawn from amoebae.…”
Section: Ability Of Bacterial Endosymbionts To Survive In Amoebaementioning
confidence: 99%