Via da me

Siracusa, Joseph M.; Curradi, Mauro

doi:10.2307/40125323

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…29 Recurrent nocturnal asthma has been described in workers sensitized to TDI and MDI. 30,31 An improvement in symptoms may be observed during periods away from the work environment (weekends, vacations). 18,20,26 The percentage of sensitized workers with persistent symptoms of asthma after years of no exposure may be 50% or higher.…”

Section: Diisocyanate-induced Sensitizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Health hazard evaluation report: HETA-95-0406-2609, Matrix Auto Body, Englewood, Colorado.

1996

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved.Additional HHE reports are available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports This Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved.Additional HHE reports are available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports This Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) report and any recommendations made herein are for the specific facility evaluated and may not be universally applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved. applicable. Any recommendations made are not to be considered as final statements of NIOSH policy or of any agency or individual involved.Additional HHE reports are available at http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports ii PREFACEThe Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch of NIOSH conducts field investigations of possible health hazards in the workplace. These investigations are conducted under the authority of Section 20(a)(6) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. 669(a)(6) which authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services, following a written request from any employer or authorized representative of employees, to determine whether any substance normally found in the place of employment has potentially toxic effects in such concentrations as used or found.The Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch also provides, upon request, technical and consultative assistance to Federal, State, and local agencies; labor; industry; and other groups or individuals to control occupational health hazards and to prevent related trauma and disease. Mention of company names or products does not constitute endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Copies of this report have been sent to employee and management representatives at Matrix and the OSHA Regional Office. This report is not copyrighted and may be freely reproduced. Single copies of this report will be available for a period of three years from the date of this report. To expedite your request, include a self-addressed mailing label along with your written request to: Measurements made included personal breathing-zone (PBZ) and area airborne levels of hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate (HDI) monomer and oligomers, various solvents (including n-butyl acetate, toluene, xylene, and ethyl acetate), total dust (paint over spray), metals (from welding), co, and noise. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND AVAILABILITY OF REPORTAll HDI monomer samples from August 1995 and March 1996 were below the analytical limit of detection None...

show abstract

Section: Diisocyanate-induced Sensitizationmentioning

confidence: 99%