2019
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2019.1572893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VGTrust: measuring trust for volunteered geographic information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This editorial highlights how these issues are discussed and addressed by the articles of this special issue and how the papers highlight emerging technologies, concepts, platforms, debates, and methodologies and techniques within VGI and suggest future research directions. This special issue gathered papers on the topics of crowdsourced geospatial data quality (Ballatore and Arsanjani 2018), thematic uncertainty and consistency across data sources (Hervey and Kuhn 2018), spatial biases (Millar et al, 2018), trust issues within VGI (Severinsen et al 2019), and contributors behaviour and interactions (Truong et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This editorial highlights how these issues are discussed and addressed by the articles of this special issue and how the papers highlight emerging technologies, concepts, platforms, debates, and methodologies and techniques within VGI and suggest future research directions. This special issue gathered papers on the topics of crowdsourced geospatial data quality (Ballatore and Arsanjani 2018), thematic uncertainty and consistency across data sources (Hervey and Kuhn 2018), spatial biases (Millar et al, 2018), trust issues within VGI (Severinsen et al 2019), and contributors behaviour and interactions (Truong et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that volunteers' experience and familiarity with the area edited in the map are good proxies to estimate the quality of their annotations in OSM. The authors in [99] propose a measure for estimating annotation trust, by using annotation statistics obtained from volunteers' activities, object geometries, and temporal data. A trust index could be also learned with machine learning methods using OSM data statistics with some reference data.…”
Section: Supporting Users Via Interaction and Skills Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be as the main datasets, the assessing or usability analysis is necessary and a large body of work proposes using trust as a proxy for VGI quality [35,36]. For example, the research [16] presented a formulaic model that addresses VGI quality issues, by quantifying trust in VGI. Further, a review [37] has classified the related literature into 30 methods that can be used to assess one or more of the 17 quality measures and indicators coming across in the literature for a map, image, and text-based VGI, respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial resolution in this study is set as 50 km, which is considered as the city-level resolution. However, as Tencent positioning big data belongs to Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) [15], its usability needs to be confirmed because of its diversity of authorship [16]. However, up to now, there is no open-source data source with high spatial-temporal accuracy in the databases covering the whole of China, so we can only consider other similar data for comparative analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%