2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00572.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Veteran Parents in Child Protective Services: Theory and Implementation

Abstract: “Veteran parents” (VPs), or parents who have experienced challenges concerning their children's health and then mentor other families through similar situations, are widely used for parent support. This model has been adopted by Child Protective Services (CPS) to increase parent engagement. Here, we expand the theoretical discussion of VPs in CPS to address the unique challenges and implementation issues associated with maltreating families. We contend that this model, as originally evaluated in pediatrics, is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of relationship prevents the feeling of isolation and solitary experience suffered by some biological families. This is a matter of providing social and emotional support to families, standing up for their voices with respect to protection services, helping connect families with formal and informal networks, and helping families to advocate for themselves (Frame, Conley, & Berrick, 2006;Leake, Longworth-Reed, Williams, & Potter, 2012;Lorthridge, McCroskey, Pecora, Chambers, & Fatemi, 2012;Nilsen, Affronti, & Coombes, 2009).…”
Section: Perspectives On Working With Families For Reunificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of relationship prevents the feeling of isolation and solitary experience suffered by some biological families. This is a matter of providing social and emotional support to families, standing up for their voices with respect to protection services, helping connect families with formal and informal networks, and helping families to advocate for themselves (Frame, Conley, & Berrick, 2006;Leake, Longworth-Reed, Williams, & Potter, 2012;Lorthridge, McCroskey, Pecora, Chambers, & Fatemi, 2012;Nilsen, Affronti, & Coombes, 2009).…”
Section: Perspectives On Working With Families For Reunificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For families with removed youth, the process of reunification and behavior change is typically coordinated by a case worker who refers parents to appropriate service providers and, ideally, continues to partner with the families throughout the process. Active partnering between the case worker and the parents has been documented to result in better alignment between the families' needs and formal case planning, which increases family commitment and compliance to the case plan (Nilsen, Affronti, & Coombes, 2009). However, the reality is that child welfare workers are not always able to be a fully engaged partner with their families because of high caseloads (GAO, 2003;Marcenko, Brown, DeVoy, & Conway, 2010), burdensome paperwork (Falk, 2015;Marcenko et al, 2010), and increased levels of stress and burnout (Anderson, 2000;Mor Barak, Nissly, & Levin, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of family engagement with the Child Protective Services (CPS) agency influences how accurately service plans address family members' needs and ultimately whether families benefit from available services (Nilsen et al 2009). Guided by the conceptual framework of the engagement process in CPS agencies (Staudt 2007), we conceptualize caregiver engagement as the result of negotiated understandings stemming from social interactions with professionals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%