2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vessel noise in spatially constricted areas: Modeling acoustic footprints of large vessels in the Cabot Strait, Eastern Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows how the received noise levels at the hydrophone decreased with greater CPA distances. Our results tend to support the 400 m minimum distance of approach for boats with respect to the St. Lawrence Estuary beluga suggested by Canada’s Marine Mammals Regulations [ 51 ], although variability caused by, e.g., slow/fast SOGs, low/high RPM, or relatively noisy engines, still led to broadband noise levels in excess of the 120 dB re 1 μPa behavioural-disturbance threshold [ 52 ] at approach distances greater than 400 m and up to nearly 1 km. Event (41) of Figure 4 reveals received noise levels above the beluga hearing audiogram near 20 kHz at a CPA distance of 586 m ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Figure 7 shows how the received noise levels at the hydrophone decreased with greater CPA distances. Our results tend to support the 400 m minimum distance of approach for boats with respect to the St. Lawrence Estuary beluga suggested by Canada’s Marine Mammals Regulations [ 51 ], although variability caused by, e.g., slow/fast SOGs, low/high RPM, or relatively noisy engines, still led to broadband noise levels in excess of the 120 dB re 1 μPa behavioural-disturbance threshold [ 52 ] at approach distances greater than 400 m and up to nearly 1 km. Event (41) of Figure 4 reveals received noise levels above the beluga hearing audiogram near 20 kHz at a CPA distance of 586 m ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…To provide a measure for change in human activities in relation to the IMOS Animal Tracking network, we also assessed AIS detections within 8 km of receivers in the IMOS Animal Tracking network. The 8 km radius was selected based on a study showing that cetaceans located 7–8 km from a vessel could experience sound pressure levels above the threshold for the onset of behavioural disturbance ( Cominelli et al, 2020 ). Although arbitrary and likely to affect the range of species tagged in the IMOS Animal Tracking network in different ways, we consider this an acceptable proxy considering the limited knowledge available on vessel impacts and given the objective was to document change in human activity across the receiver network.…”
Section: Covid-19 Impact On Marine Activities In Australiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the presumed avoidance of whales from ferries, concrete measures could be considered and are urgently needed to reduce anthropic pressure, such as reduced ferry speeds or shifting of the ferry routes offshore to avoid areas of underwater canyons that are of importance for sperm whales 67 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%