2020
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very short vs. long dual antiplatelet therapy after second generation drug-eluting stents in 35 785 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Aim To provide an updated assessment of the efficacy–safety profile of very short (1 or 3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with long (12 months) DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). Methods and results Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing very short vs. long DAPT in 35 785 patients undergoing PCI were selected. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent evidence has shown net benefits in the ischemic/bleeding balance for short (≤6 months) vs. 12 months DAPT in patients with low ischemic risk [ 94 , 95 ]. Seven major RCTs published in recent years and evaluating a very short DAPT (1 or 3 months) after stenting as compared to 12-month therapy [ 60 , 61 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ] were analyzed together in a recent metanalysis [ 101 ]. Interestingly, very short DAPT yielded comparable rates of all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis, and major acute cardiovascular endpoints than 12 months DAPT.…”
Section: Treatment Strategies After Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent evidence has shown net benefits in the ischemic/bleeding balance for short (≤6 months) vs. 12 months DAPT in patients with low ischemic risk [ 94 , 95 ]. Seven major RCTs published in recent years and evaluating a very short DAPT (1 or 3 months) after stenting as compared to 12-month therapy [ 60 , 61 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 ] were analyzed together in a recent metanalysis [ 101 ]. Interestingly, very short DAPT yielded comparable rates of all-cause mortality, stent thrombosis, and major acute cardiovascular endpoints than 12 months DAPT.…”
Section: Treatment Strategies After Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, very short DAPT was associated with reduced rates of major bleeding or any bleeding. Subgroup analyses showed consistent results for 1 vs. 3 month DAPT and for aspirin vs. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy following very short DAPT [ 101 ].…”
Section: Treatment Strategies After Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 In fact, most patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease who are treated with aspirin remain at risk of ischemic recurrences and alternative strategies, including DAPT, have not shown to be of clinical benefit. 24,25 In COMPASS, a total of 27,395 patients were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban 2.5 mg/bid plus aspirin (i.e., DPI), rivaroxaban 5 mg/bid, or aspirin. 5 While rivaroxaban 5 mg/bid did not significantly reduce ischemic events, DPI was associated with a 24% reduction of MACE (composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction) compared with aspirin alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…strategies, including DAPT, have not shown to be of clinical benefit 24,25 . In COMPASS, a total of 27,395 were randomly assigned to receive rivaroxaban 2.5 mg/bid plus aspirin (i.e., DPI), rivaroxaban 5 mg/bid, or aspirin 5 .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, prolonged DAPT after PCI is related to significantly increased risk of bleeding compared to short or standard DAPT ( 30 ). However, the results of this study demonstrated that the significant reduction of ischemic events by prolonged DAPT in diabetic patients led to favorable outcome including reduced mortality, overwhelming the numerically, but statistically not significant, increased bleeding events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%