1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80023-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very long-term memory for prose and verse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
74
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summarizing the relevant literature, however, he noted that three other st'idies using free recall of prose passages revealed that thematically important ideas are forgotten at a slower rate than less relevant ideas. Christaansen's explanation of why he chose to use recognition as his retention-measuring method is interesting, because it illustrates a property of memory that is, we believe, one of its major intrinsic characteristics: memory is both reconstructive (e.g., see Bartlett, 1932;Sachs, 1967;Bransford & Johnson, 1972;Loftus & Palmer, 1979) and reproductive (e.g., see Cofer, Chmielewski & Brockway, 1976;Rubin, 1977), depending on the perceived situational demands. Recall of a text, states Christaansen, allows differential retrieval and reconstructive processes or strategies to operate at the time of output, i.e., at the time of the retention test.…”
Section: Recent Studies On "Standard" Overlearningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summarizing the relevant literature, however, he noted that three other st'idies using free recall of prose passages revealed that thematically important ideas are forgotten at a slower rate than less relevant ideas. Christaansen's explanation of why he chose to use recognition as his retention-measuring method is interesting, because it illustrates a property of memory that is, we believe, one of its major intrinsic characteristics: memory is both reconstructive (e.g., see Bartlett, 1932;Sachs, 1967;Bransford & Johnson, 1972;Loftus & Palmer, 1979) and reproductive (e.g., see Cofer, Chmielewski & Brockway, 1976;Rubin, 1977), depending on the perceived situational demands. Recall of a text, states Christaansen, allows differential retrieval and reconstructive processes or strategies to operate at the time of output, i.e., at the time of the retention test.…”
Section: Recent Studies On "Standard" Overlearningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there were significant correlations between performance on the order reconstruction task and the familiarity ratings, indicating that prior frequency of exposure is probably responsible for these serial position effects in semantic memory (as Roediger and Crowder originally suspected). Similarly, with no control over learning, differential exposure could also explain the primacy effects observed by Rubin (1977) in his study of the recall of well-known passages of prose and poetry, including "The Preamble to the Constitution" and "Hamlet's Soliloquy. "…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence indicates that although meaning or gist is best remembered, instances of exact recollection of phrases is possible. However, it is rare [Rubin, 1977]. Following Bartlett's work, research in several fields, including linguistics, psychology, anthropology and artificial intelligence, has produced many related structures including: scripts [Bower et al, 1979;Shank, 1975], frames [Minsky, 1975] and plans [Abelson, 1973].…”
Section: Structure Of Memory Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead what tends to be remembered are high-level meanings or gists [Clark and Clark, 1977; Chapter 3. A Review of PIM Behaviour and Tools with Respect to Memory Rubin, 1977;Sachs, 1967]. This suggests that people would not be adept at remembering terms in a document, the subject of an email etc.…”
Section: Commonly Available Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%