2010
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.110.958249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very Long-Term (15 to 20 Years) Clinical and Angiographic Outcome After Coronary Bare Metal Stent Implantation

Abstract: Luminal renarrowing of the stented segment beyond 4 years was a progressive process extending beyond 10 years. The angiographic observation of late in-stent restenosis was clinically relevant because a corresponding progressive increase in the incidence of late target lesion revascularization was observed beyond 4 years and up to 15 to 20 years after bare metal stent implantation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
3
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
60
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 However, the permanence of metallic DES may result in expansive remodeling, late strut fractures, abnormal vasomotion, and neoatherosclerosis, which collectively contribute to a 2% to 3% annual risk of stent-associated events beyond the first year after implantation, potentially for the life of the patient. [3][4][5] Drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were designed to mitigate these very late risks of metallic stents by providing mechanical support only during the required period of stent-induced vascular remodeling, with complete bioresorption within several years thereafter. The temporary nature of BVS may also confer other advantages compared with permanent stents such as treatment of bifurcation lesions, long diffuse disease, and in-stent restenosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 However, the permanence of metallic DES may result in expansive remodeling, late strut fractures, abnormal vasomotion, and neoatherosclerosis, which collectively contribute to a 2% to 3% annual risk of stent-associated events beyond the first year after implantation, potentially for the life of the patient. [3][4][5] Drug-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) were designed to mitigate these very late risks of metallic stents by providing mechanical support only during the required period of stent-induced vascular remodeling, with complete bioresorption within several years thereafter. The temporary nature of BVS may also confer other advantages compared with permanent stents such as treatment of bifurcation lesions, long diffuse disease, and in-stent restenosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] First-generation drugeluting stents (DES) succeeded in further reducing the rate of early TLR, 7,8 but were associated with continued occurrence of late TLR and very late stent thrombosis (ST), which might have been attenuated with newer-generation DES using biocompatible or biodegradable polymer. [9][10][11] Currently, a fully bioresorbable drug-eluting vascular scaffold (BVS) is under clinical evaluation with expectations for better healing responses of the vessel wall and reduction of late adverse events related to the treatment site by eliminating permanent metallic implants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, 2 The major causes of death in these patients are cardiac death and vascular (excluding cardiac) death. 3 Patients with CAD with one or more atherosclerotic lesions have a poor prognosis 4,5 that is not improved by revascularization in patients with stable angina. 1 Little is known, however, about the long-term outcomes of CAD in patients with one or more atherosclerotic lesions after revascularization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%