Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1996
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112096007537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very large structures in plane turbulent Couette flow

Abstract: A direct numerical simulation was carried out of plane turbulent Couette flow at a Reynolds number of 750, based on half the velocity difference between the walls and half the channel width. Particular attention was paid to choosing a computational box that is large enough to accommodate even the largest scales of the turbulence. In the central region of the channel very large elongated structures were observed, in accordance with earlier findings. The study is focused on the properties of these structures, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
150
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
34
150
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the implication of the canonical scaling for the mean-flow correction and the relation to fully-turbulent mean profiles, whilst intriguing, is not pursued here. In fact the limiting form of the mean-flow correction agrees well with turbulent mean profiles for plane Couette flow; see for example Figure 2 of Komminaho et al (1996). It appears then that the basic shape for the mean flow correction in a turbulent boundary layer is driven by the large scale structures described here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the implication of the canonical scaling for the mean-flow correction and the relation to fully-turbulent mean profiles, whilst intriguing, is not pursued here. In fact the limiting form of the mean-flow correction agrees well with turbulent mean profiles for plane Couette flow; see for example Figure 2 of Komminaho et al (1996). It appears then that the basic shape for the mean flow correction in a turbulent boundary layer is driven by the large scale structures described here.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The existence of such a minimum length for spot formation has been known by the computational community for some time; see for example Lundbladh and Johansson (1991), Komminaho et al (1996). If the result we find is indeed a predictor of the box length needed to allow spot formation to begin it is significant because for any high Reynolds number it tells us how long the computational box used must be in order to capture turbulent spots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…It is well known 1,2 that such structures exist in the near wall region of turbulent boundary layers and channel flows where they scale in wall units with a mean spanwise spacing z + Ϸ 100. There is also evidence of the existence of large coherent streaky structures extending outside the near wall region in the turbulent boundary layer, 3,4 the turbulent Couette flow, 5 and the turbulent channel flow. 6 The size of these structures seems to scale in external units.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their refined (128×128×128)-grid, has a wallnormal grid spacing at the wall of y + ≈ 0.2, which is sufficiently small to resolve the steep velocity gradient in the viscous sublayer. Their streamwise and spanwise domain sizes L + ≈ 6600 and W + ≈ 1200, are large enough to capture not only the near-wall, vortical structures, but also the large, central structures (Komminaho, Lundbladh & Johansson 1996).…”
Section: Turbulent Single-phase Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that Couette flow requires a very large separation distance x 10H, for the fluctuations to become fully uncorrelated, see e.g. Komminaho et al (1996). Owing to the use of cubic and homogeneous grids in the present numerical method, simulating on such large domains is unfeasible, requiring excessive amounts of grid nodes.…”
Section: Turbulence Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%