2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2244339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Very high resolution images classification by fine tuning deep convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained for the three combinations of CaffeNet and GoogleNet as features extractors from the last convolutional layer (C5) and the output of the top inception module (IM) respectively, are reported for WHU-RS dataset in the following tables where they are compared to the results obtained for the same dataset classification task by fine tuning each CNN model [10] and CaffeNet model as features extractor from fully connected layer and convolutional layer [3]. Tables 1 and 2 display the WHU-RS dataset classification accuracies of our different fusion models compared with the previous work done on WHU-RS dataset.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results obtained for the three combinations of CaffeNet and GoogleNet as features extractors from the last convolutional layer (C5) and the output of the top inception module (IM) respectively, are reported for WHU-RS dataset in the following tables where they are compared to the results obtained for the same dataset classification task by fine tuning each CNN model [10] and CaffeNet model as features extractor from fully connected layer and convolutional layer [3]. Tables 1 and 2 display the WHU-RS dataset classification accuracies of our different fusion models compared with the previous work done on WHU-RS dataset.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collection from different resolution satellite images, the variation in scale, illumination and viewpoint-dependent appearance in some categories make this dataset more complicated [3] as displayed in Figure 2. The results obtained are evaluated by comparing them to those obtained by [10], where authors fine-tuned the CNN models, and [3] where the CNNs are considered as features extractors; both works were carried out for the classification of the WHU-RS dataset.…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These operators compute the maximum or the average value within a small spatial block [27]. Pooling with filters size of 2 × 2 with a stride of 2 are considered ideal [29]. Fig.…”
Section: ̂= ( ) (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fully-connected layer connects to all the neurons of the previous layer (Fig. 2) [29]. Fully connected layers are typically used as last layer of the network and perform the classification.…”
Section: ̂= ( ) (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%