1983
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3290080307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical soil water movement in a tropical rainforest catchment in northeast queensland

Abstract: In a tropical rainforest catchment, shallow piezometers respond almost instantaneously to rainfall, but the dominant groundwater recharge mechanisms are not well understood. To improve understanding, the downward movement of soil water on a runoff plot was traced using tritiated water injected at 0.20 m below the surface which marks the lower boundary of active subsurface storm flow. The tritium pulse was translated slowly down the profile, apparently dominated by interstitial piston flow on the lines describe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in these quantities is minor, and the subsequent recovery exceeds the initial levels significantly, as well as the corresponding levels in South Creek. Most obvious, however, is the discrepancy between the respective levels in gully A and in gully C. In accordance with the discussion of event 1, this constitutes prima-facie evidence that, in this event, preceded only 5 days earlier by a 177.7 mm rainfall, the runoff in gully A consists to a considerable extent of subsurface stormflow, derived from upper soil horizons, above the 'hydrologic throttle' (Bonell and Balek, 1993, p. 215) (Bonell et al, 1984). These layers are more likely to contribute as the dry periods between events decrease.…”
Section: Event 2 -23 February 1993 442 MM Rain In 3 Hsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The decrease in these quantities is minor, and the subsequent recovery exceeds the initial levels significantly, as well as the corresponding levels in South Creek. Most obvious, however, is the discrepancy between the respective levels in gully A and in gully C. In accordance with the discussion of event 1, this constitutes prima-facie evidence that, in this event, preceded only 5 days earlier by a 177.7 mm rainfall, the runoff in gully A consists to a considerable extent of subsurface stormflow, derived from upper soil horizons, above the 'hydrologic throttle' (Bonell and Balek, 1993, p. 215) (Bonell et al, 1984). These layers are more likely to contribute as the dry periods between events decrease.…”
Section: Event 2 -23 February 1993 442 MM Rain In 3 Hsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These findings are in line with those reported for organic rich soils in the Scottish highlands (Tetzlaff et al, ). The formation of this layer likely results from the abrupt vertical K sat reduction in this soil layer compared to the overlying rooted layer (Table ), caused by the lower density of fine roots (Bonell, Cassells, & Gilmour, ). Moreover, the high moisture (soil water storage) likely results from the high organic matter and clay content of the andic horizon (Table ), to which water molecules can be easily bound (Yang et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for this phenomenon, we adjusted soil porosity, calculated as a function of bulk density and increased the saturated hydraulic conductivity for all texture classes by a factor of approximately 2. This figure is based on our own measurements and on investigations by Bonell et al (1983), who showed for a catchment in the center of the study area that values for the saturated hydraulic conductivity were up to 20 m day À1 .…”
Section: Anaerobic Balloonmentioning
confidence: 94%