2008
DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-901-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical profiles of urban aerosol complex refractive index in the frame of ESQUIF airborne measurements

Abstract: Abstract.A synergy between lidar, sunphotometer and in situ measurements has been applied to airborne observations performed during the Etude et Simulation de la QUalité de l'air en Ile-de-France (ESQUIF), enabling the retrieval of vertical profiles for the aerosol complex refractive index (ACRI) and single-scattering albedo with a vertical resolution of 200 m over Paris area. The averaged value over the entire planetary boundary layer (PBL) for the ACRI is close to 1.51(±0.02)-i0.017(±0.003) at 532 nm. The si… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For global model, in Chin et al (2002), AOT is overestimated at low aerosol levels, but simulated AOT agree within a factor of 2 and an overall correlation of 70% for monthly data and for all considered stations. AOT computed in Ginoux et al (2006) 0.90, which is coherent with the values obtained for the ES-QUIF experiment (Raut and Chazette, 2007b;Chazette et al, 2005). In the southeastern part of France, simulated SSA ranges here from 0.91 to 0.93, that is in the range 0.85±0.5 found in Mallet et al (2003).…”
Section: Statistic Indicator Definitionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…For global model, in Chin et al (2002), AOT is overestimated at low aerosol levels, but simulated AOT agree within a factor of 2 and an overall correlation of 70% for monthly data and for all considered stations. AOT computed in Ginoux et al (2006) 0.90, which is coherent with the values obtained for the ES-QUIF experiment (Raut and Chazette, 2007b;Chazette et al, 2005). In the southeastern part of France, simulated SSA ranges here from 0.91 to 0.93, that is in the range 0.85±0.5 found in Mallet et al (2003).…”
Section: Statistic Indicator Definitionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Uncertainties on the measured (horizontal bars) scattering and absorption coefficients are also shown in the plots. Raut and Chazette, 2008). Larger values of both n and k are instead obtained here compared to AERONET retrievals at different sites in the Western Mediterranean (1.38-1.46 for n and 0.003-0.01 for k at 440 and 670 nm; Mallet et al, 2013).…”
Section: Complex Refractive Index Of Pollution Aerosolsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…With the aim of understanding which of the two instruments measures correctly in the 0.4-1.0 µm range we performed an optical test, which consisted in calculating with Mie theory the scattering coefficient at 450, 550, and 700 nm based on the PCASP and GRIMM size data, and then in comparing it with simultaneous nephelometer measurements. Optical calculations were performed by fixing the complex refractive index at 1.6 − 0.01 i, so at the mean of the range of values reported in the literature for pollution aerosols (Ebert et al, 2002(Ebert et al, , 2004Mallet et al, 2003Mallet et al, , 2011Müller et al, 2002;Raut and Chazette, 2008). SLRs characterized by a low variability in terms of scattering coefficient and particle concentration were selected.…”
Section: Aircraft Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty due to LR at 532 nm has been discussed in several papers (e.g. Raut and Chazette, 2008a). This is a major source of uncertainty depending on the constraint used.…”
Section: Uncertainties On Lrmentioning
confidence: 99%