2019
DOI: 10.3390/atmos10100599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Profiles of Ozone Concentration Collected by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and the Mixing of the Nighttime Boundary Layer over an Amazonian Urban Area

Abstract: The nighttime boundary layer was studied in an urban area surrounded by tropical forest by use of a copter-type unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in central Amazonia during the wet season. Fifty-seven vertical profiles of ozone concentration, potential temperature, and specific humidity were collected from surface to 500 m above ground level (a.g.l.) at high vertical and temporal resolutions by use of embedded sensors on the UAV. Abrupt changes in ozone concentration with altitude served as a proxy of nighttime bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to three pairs of ozone profiles, although there were slight variations in ozone concentrations, the ozone measurements of the POM have also been generally consistent with the instruments used on a tethered balloon platform [38]. As for hexacopter UAV platforms, Guimarães et al [23] used the same platform (M600) and ozone monitor (POM), and successfully obtained fifty-seven ozone profiles from March to May, 2018 in Brazil, indicating the possible use of UAV in improving atmospheric measurements of ozone. In this study, the comparison results of two pairs of ozone profiles are presented in Figure S2 and Table S1, which also indicate good consistency between the two platforms.…”
Section: Uav Platform Verificationsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to three pairs of ozone profiles, although there were slight variations in ozone concentrations, the ozone measurements of the POM have also been generally consistent with the instruments used on a tethered balloon platform [38]. As for hexacopter UAV platforms, Guimarães et al [23] used the same platform (M600) and ozone monitor (POM), and successfully obtained fifty-seven ozone profiles from March to May, 2018 in Brazil, indicating the possible use of UAV in improving atmospheric measurements of ozone. In this study, the comparison results of two pairs of ozone profiles are presented in Figure S2 and Table S1, which also indicate good consistency between the two platforms.…”
Section: Uav Platform Verificationsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Compared with fixed-wing UAV platforms, multi-rotor UAV platforms do not provide additional contaminants, and rarely have requirements for takeoff sites. Consequently, multi-rotor UAV platforms are much more useful when it comes to performing field observations within the boundary layers [18][19][20]23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical and electrochemical micro detectors have been used on a drone to detect the gaseous compounds and particle matter (PM). Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3) and methane (CH4), are the main monitored gaseous compounds (Chiba, et al, 2019;Gu, et al, 2018;Guimarães, et al, 2019;Huang, 2013;Schuyler and Guzman, 2017;Villa, et al, 2016). PM2.5 (diameter < 2.5 m) and PM10 (diameter < 10 m) are the main PM measurement targets (Gu, et al, 2018;Zhou, et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hovering UAVs of 25 kg and lighter are especially promising for filling data gaps in near‐surface concentrations for species that are horizontally heterogeneous above the landscape on scales of 10–1,000 m (Chang et al., 2018; McKinney et al., 2019). Atmospheric measurements can be achieved by mounting compact sensors or samplers onto UAVs of 1–25 kg (Aurell et al., 2017; Black et al., 2018; Guimarães et al., 2019, 2020; B. Liu et al., 2020; McKinney et al., 2019; Neumann et al., 2019; Ye et al., 2020). For example, Aurell et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%