Vertical Integration: Hospital Ownership Of Physician Practices Is Associated With Higher Prices And Spending

Abstract

We examined the consequences of contractual or ownership relationships between hospitals and physician practices, often described as vertical integration. Such integration can reduce health spending and increase the quality of care by improving communication across care settings, but it can also increase providers' market power and facilitate the payment of what are effectively kickbacks for inappropriate referrals. We investigated the impact of vertical integration on hospital prices, volumes (admissions), and spending for privately insured patients. Using hospital claims from Truven Analytics MarketScan for the nonelderly privately insured in the period 2001-07, we constructed county-level indices of prices, volumes, and spending and adjusted them for enrollees' age and sex. We measured hospital-physician integration using information from the American Hospital Association on the types of relationships hospitals have with physicians. We found that an increase in the market share of hospitals with the tightest vertically integrated relationship with physicians--ownership of physician practices--was associated with higher hospital prices and spending. We found that an increase in contractual integration reduced the frequency of hospital admissions, but this effect was relatively small. Taken together, our results provide a mixed, although somewhat negative, picture of vertical integration from the perspective of the privately insured.

Bridging Gaps in Mental Health Care: Lessons Learned from the Welcome Back Veterans Initiative

“…In its health care application, some key elements of the lean approach are aligning front-line staff with the program's performance objectives, developing staff members as problem solvers so that they can make continuous improvements, creating workflows with flexible regimentation, and training leadership to coach staff teams (Jaworski, 2017). This approach is increasingly being used in the health care sector with the goal of consolidating services through coordination of those services within a network to increase efficiency (Gaynor and Town, 2012;Baker, Bundorf, & Kessler, 2014;White and Egouchi, 2014).…”

Forecasts and Drivers of Health Expenditure Growth in California

“…Although ACOs and ACO-like arrangements have produced savings, the results are not always consistent (e.g., Kocot et al 2014;Colla et al 2012). Moreover, there is a concern that provider consolidation may lead to higher prices, potentially increasing the impact of medical-specific inflation on expenditure growth (Health Care Cost Institute 2014; Baker et al 2014;Robinson 2011;Berenson et al 2010). For more information on ACOs, see the Berkeley Forum's report entitled Accountable Care Organizations in California: Promise and Performance (Shortell et al 2015).…”

The Payment Reform Paradox

“…They find that prices tend to be higher by a small but significant margin in the most tightly integrated markets. 12 Baker and colleagues' data did not allow them to differentiate between financial and clinical integration, leaving important questions unanswered about whether closer ties between physicians and hospitals necessarily lead toward greater efficiency and coordination of care. If the object of these alliances is to make more money, they can't be expected to transform health care.…”