1996
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199600510-00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical guided bonegraft augmentation in a new canine mandibular model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators have examined the various technical considerations in this regard. 12,13,14 These intraoperative considerations include the adequacy of donor bone volume, use of block grafts vs. ground bone, method of fixation, concomitant use of barrier membranes, and degree of flap coaption. In 1993, Buser and co-workers presented a technique for localized ridge augmentation using stainless steel pins to maintain space underneath a barrier membrane.…”
Section: Clinical and Scientific Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have examined the various technical considerations in this regard. 12,13,14 These intraoperative considerations include the adequacy of donor bone volume, use of block grafts vs. ground bone, method of fixation, concomitant use of barrier membranes, and degree of flap coaption. In 1993, Buser and co-workers presented a technique for localized ridge augmentation using stainless steel pins to maintain space underneath a barrier membrane.…”
Section: Clinical and Scientific Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computed tomograms obtained preand postoperatively showed consistent ossification of the osteotomized and distracted areas 6 Chiapasco et al [20] 4 patients received 15 Brånemark System implants (Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden), and 4 patients received 11 screw-type ITI implants (Straumann, Waldenburg, Switzerland).…”
Section: Weeks 7 Monthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Placement of implants may be prevented by inadequate bone dimensions unless the deficient areas have bone grafts placed or the inferior alveolar nerve repositioned [2]. In order to correct bone, it is important to carry out autogenous onlay bone grafts, guided bone regeneration, alloplastic augmentation and alveolar split grafting [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Each of these have their respective pros and cons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…enlarged solid base for bone deposition (30). Bone autografting is known to be the gold standard for bone reconstruction (17,31,33). However, autogenic bone grafting always requires a second operation site and may cause various degrees of morbidity in the donor area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%