2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje7903_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Equity in School Finance and the Potential for Increasing School Responsiveness to Student and Staff Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, due to major developments in the educational policy arena (e.g., the Bilingual Education Act of 1968; ESEA, 1965) and several landmark court cases (e.g., Lau v. Nichols, 1974;Serrano v. Priest, 1976), educational policies have migrated from the horizontal equity model to one of vertical equity, in which students with different needs require additional resources to better address those needs. Vertical equity calls for the unequal treatment of unequals and has gained popularity among policymakers and stakeholders; making it the most widely and commonly used method for leveling the playing field (Berne & Stiefel, 1999;Rodriguez, 2004;Timar & Chyu, 2010).…”
Section: Historical Background and Shift In Focus: Ells And Supplemenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, due to major developments in the educational policy arena (e.g., the Bilingual Education Act of 1968; ESEA, 1965) and several landmark court cases (e.g., Lau v. Nichols, 1974;Serrano v. Priest, 1976), educational policies have migrated from the horizontal equity model to one of vertical equity, in which students with different needs require additional resources to better address those needs. Vertical equity calls for the unequal treatment of unequals and has gained popularity among policymakers and stakeholders; making it the most widely and commonly used method for leveling the playing field (Berne & Stiefel, 1999;Rodriguez, 2004;Timar & Chyu, 2010).…”
Section: Historical Background and Shift In Focus: Ells And Supplemenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bilingualism amongst immigrants and the children of immigrants is still frequently viewed as a deficit (Grant & Sleeter, 2007;Herrera & Murry, 1999;Rodriguez, 2004). Further, bilingual programs, once legislatively perceived (i.e., under Title VII of 1968, which also spearheaded state mandates for bilingual education) as the best way of educating ELLs (and widely supported by the scholars in the field; see Hakuta & Diaz, 1985;Peal & Lambert, 1962;Portes & Hao, 1998;Rumbaut & Cornelius, 1995) in the 1990s, the nation has witnessed a steady decline in bilingual programs for ELLs.…”
Section: Ells' Educational Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on two key principles of equity in this analysis -horizontal and vertical (e.g., Alexander, 2016;Rodriguez, 2004;Rolle & Jimenez-Castellanos, 2014;Verstegen, 2013) and their relevance to school funding in Minnesota for EL. Both these concepts relate to equal and nondiscriminatory treatment; that is, children should be treated similarly unless there is good reason for the differentiation.…”
Section: Measuring Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 In contrast, vertical equity is defined as the unequal, but fair treatment of unequals, and is contextualized by a fair process. 21,22 In the context of public health, vertical equity may be described as a funding allocation corresponding to needs in states reflected by their diverse sizes and levels of risk in the population. Thus, vertical equity attempts to connect funding to the needs of states beyond population size.…”
Section: Principles Of Equitymentioning
confidence: 99%