2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical distributions of leaf area and inclination angle, and their relationship in a 46-year-old Chamaecyparis obtusa stand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vertical distributions of leaf angle for a 46-year-old stand of Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) in central Japan decreased exponentially from top to bottom of the canopy, ranging in value from greater than 55˚ to 30.3˚ [35]. Again, these studies show a general pattern similar to the simulated summer case at 40˚N.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The vertical distributions of leaf angle for a 46-year-old stand of Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) in central Japan decreased exponentially from top to bottom of the canopy, ranging in value from greater than 55˚ to 30.3˚ [35]. Again, these studies show a general pattern similar to the simulated summer case at 40˚N.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…LIA distribution has been often related to light environment within the canopy and photosynthetic productivity (Muraoka et al, 1998;Niinemets and Fleck, 2002;Niinemets, 2010;Utsugi et al, 2006). It has been also reported that plants decrease the leaf temperature by adjusting the LIA more vertically (Medina et al, 1978;Muraoka et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the LIA distribution changes depending on the position in the canopy. For instance, it has been often observed that LIA changes gradually from more vertical in the upper canopy to more horizontal in the lower canopy (Niinemets, 2010; Utsugi et al, 2006). Such variation improves light interception in the lower canopy and enables the upper canopy to intercept less potentially damage from midday solar radiation and to allow more light to reach the lower canopy (Niinemets, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest structure, captured by forest inventories, provides valuable information about the ecosystem. This includes the three-dimensional (3-D) canopy architecture information that greatly affects the radiation regime within the canopy [17], and many other biochemical and ecological processes such as photosynthesis [16], evaporation [11], and transpiration [18]. Most of traditional forest structure mensuration methods using digital hemisphere photographs [19] and range finders cannot capture the 3-D structural information for the single tree and forest stand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%