2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2419.2008.00466.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical distributions of Japanese sardine (Sardinops melanostictus) eggs: comparison of observations and a wind‐forced Lagrangian mixing model

Abstract: To understand how Japanese sardine eggs vertically disperse in water, we acquired a series of depthresolved samples of eggs while tracking a drogued buoy to follow the water mass in which the eggs were spawned. This survey was conducted in early March of 1991, when the sardine population was abundant and actively spawning in the Pacific off Kyushu. Buoyancy of the eggs was estimated by measuring the specific gravity, and was 1-4 · 10 )3 less than that of the water in which they were spawned, giving a rising sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional sediment mixing models are advection-diffusion models, where the 167 record of a sedimentary event is distributed within a mixed layer characterized by a 168 mixing coefficient (which can be modeled identically to a diffusion coefficient) and 169 advected by burrows into layers of sediments that are older than the event (Guinasso and 170 Schink, 1975). model with depth-dependent eddy diffusivity of Tanaka and Franks (2008) to model Ir 173 anomaly shapes across the K/Pg boundary. They used the mixing model to explain the 174 observed Ir anomaly shape at North Pacific DSDP Site 577B, Shatsky Rise (their Fig.…”
Section: Plasma Mass Spectrometry At the Institute Of Marine And Coasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional sediment mixing models are advection-diffusion models, where the 167 record of a sedimentary event is distributed within a mixed layer characterized by a 168 mixing coefficient (which can be modeled identically to a diffusion coefficient) and 169 advected by burrows into layers of sediments that are older than the event (Guinasso and 170 Schink, 1975). model with depth-dependent eddy diffusivity of Tanaka and Franks (2008) to model Ir 173 anomaly shapes across the K/Pg boundary. They used the mixing model to explain the 174 observed Ir anomaly shape at North Pacific DSDP Site 577B, Shatsky Rise (their Fig.…”
Section: Plasma Mass Spectrometry At the Institute Of Marine And Coasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to their spawning season, another hypothesis for the biological function of UV vision in S. melanostictus could be proposed. In the north-western Pacific, E. japonicus spawns throughout the year with a peak from April to September, while S. melanostictus spawns during a much shorter period of February to April (Aoki & Murayama, 1993;Takasuka et al, 2008;Tanaka & Franks, 2008;Gnyubkina et al, 2013). Spawning is mainly associated with water temperature; S. melanostictus spawns when the sea surface is cooler whereas E. japonicus spawns when the sea surface is warmer (Takasuka et al, 2008).…”
Section: S I G N I F I C a N C E O F P Ot E N T I A L U V-p H Ot O S mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above model has been further developed by several authors to account for density stratification in the upper layer and for depth-dependent eddy diffusivity coefficient, K ( z ), and for non-stationary conditions [ 30 , 57 59 ]. For example, an important modification of the original simplified model is that depth-dependent K ( z ) in combination with a homogeneous mixed layer can results in displacement of the maximum egg concentration from the surface to levels deeper down in the mixed layer [ 60 , 61 ], which was also confirmed by their observations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%