1982
DOI: 10.14430/arctic2306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Distribution of Zooplankton in Eastern Lancaster Sound and Western Baffin Bay, July-October 1978

Abstract: at 19 oceanographic stations were analyzed for species composition, abundance, biomass and vertical distribution. Sampling was by closing nets hauled vertically at five depth intervals between O and 1900 m. At least 116 species were present in the macro-zooplankton of the study mea. Species not previously reported from the area included the copepods Spinocalanus horridus, Chiridiella reducta, Derjuginia tolli, Neoscolecithrix farrani?, Pachyprilus pacificus, Haloptilus longicirrus?, Mormonillapolaris, and Mons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in north Baffin Bay and Lancaster Sound showed that Eukrohnia hamata (Möbius) was the most abundant chaetognath, being present throughout the water column. Sagitta elegans was less abundant and restricted to Arctic Ocean water (0-200 m), mostly the upper 50 m (Buchanan and Sekerak 1982;Sameoto 1987). The much larger Sagitta maxima was most abundant in deep (>400 m) water in south Baffin Bay (Sameoto 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in north Baffin Bay and Lancaster Sound showed that Eukrohnia hamata (Möbius) was the most abundant chaetognath, being present throughout the water column. Sagitta elegans was less abundant and restricted to Arctic Ocean water (0-200 m), mostly the upper 50 m (Buchanan and Sekerak 1982;Sameoto 1987). The much larger Sagitta maxima was most abundant in deep (>400 m) water in south Baffin Bay (Sameoto 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. pygmaeus is an abundant member of the plankton in mid-water layers of the Southern Ocean (e.g. Hopkins 1985a; Schnack et al 1985a;Hopkins and Torres 1988) Buchanan and Sekerak 1982), whereas C. citer is a com--50~ mon species in the Antarctic epiplankton (Kaczmaruk 1983;Zmijewska 1983;Schnack et al 1985 a;Tanimura et -55~ al. 1986;Hopkins 1987;Hopkins and Torres 1988;Tucker and Burton 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light cycle limits the period in which photosynthetic production is possible, and for the pelagic algal community, this is further restricted by ice cover in spring. In the eastern Canadian Arctic the abundant pelagic zooplankton community is dominated by the copepod herbivores Calanus hyperboreus and C. glacialis (Buchanan & Sekerak 1982, Longhurst et al 1984, which crowd into the surface layers to feed during the summer and then descend to overwinter at depths greater than 300 m (Dawson 1978, Kosobokova 1978, Longhurst et al 1984. During this intense feeding period there is no significant diurnal migration in C. hyperboreus or C. glacialis (Bbmstedt 1984, Longhurst et al 1984, which contrasts with the behavior of C. finmarchicus when found in the Arctic (Sameoto 1984) and also in Calanus species in temperate regions (Bohrer B Inter-Research/Printed in F. R. Germany 1980, Herman et al 1981, Huntley & Brooks 1982, Williams & Conway 1984, Simard et al 1985.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%