Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2007
DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2007/0169-0211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical distribution and feeding activity of Epischura baicalensis Sars (Copepoda) nauplii in response to two predators in Lake Baikal in winter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, changes in the daytime depth distribution could be influenced by changes in zooplankton vertical migration behavior. During the daylight hours most zooplankton species in Baikal shift to a deeper position in the water column to avoid visually orienting predators [48] , [49] . If the occurrence or extent of vertical migration changed, then this could result in shallower daytime depth distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, changes in the daytime depth distribution could be influenced by changes in zooplankton vertical migration behavior. During the daylight hours most zooplankton species in Baikal shift to a deeper position in the water column to avoid visually orienting predators [48] , [49] . If the occurrence or extent of vertical migration changed, then this could result in shallower daytime depth distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speculate that increasing temperatures could alter the costs and benefits of staying in shallower water, thus leading zooplankton to occupy shallower depths during daylight hours [15] . Patterns of diel vertical migration are strong for several of the most abundant taxa [48] , including Epischura [49] and its primary predators Macrohectopus [53] and the golomyanka [34] . More work examining the trade-offs for Lake Baikal zooplankton might provide insights into the potential for this mechanism to explain the long-term changes in depth distributions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Температуру воды, хлорофилл (хл "а"), фотосинтетически активную радиацию (ФАР) и другие параметры измеряли зондом AAQ-Rinko [13]. Кроме того, для измерения температуры воды использовались логгеры (RBR-Company, Канада) TR-1000 (разрешение 0,002°C, точность 0,05°C) и TR-1060 (разрешение 0,0001°C, точность 0,002°C Основными компонентами мезозоопланктона в подледный период являются разные возрастные стадии эндемичного рачка Epischura baikalensis Sars 1900 и несколько видов коловраток [15]. В наблюдаемый период в поверхностном слое 0-10 м численность всего зоопланктона была 459 экз./м 3 (рис.…”
Section: материал и методы исследованияunclassified
“…The few studies that investigated crustacean feeding under lake ice suggested that copepod nauplii (Tereza et al., 2007), cladocerans (Rautio et al., 2011; Säwström et al., 2009), and some predatory copepods (Karlsson & Sawstrom, 2009) could maintain some foraging activities. However, extensive accumulation of fat storage before or around the onset of ice cover is a trait that is shared by many of the taxa that dominate zooplankton communities under ice (mainly copepods at copepodite and adult instars ; Grosbois et al., 2017; Mariash et al., 2011; Vanderploeg et al., 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%