Vertical Bone Implant Contact Around Anterior Immediate Implants and Their Stability After Using Either Alloplast or L-PRF or Both in Peri-Implant Gap: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Alam, Shahbaz; Dhiman, Arjun; Jain, Veena; Bhutia, Ongkila; Pruthi, Gunjan

doi:10.1007/s12663-020-01426-8

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sample size was estimated assuming 5% alpha error and 80% study power. The mean (SD) marginal bone loss after 3 months was 2.27 (1.13) mm for the control group, 0.26 (0.065) mm for liquid PRF (20,21) and 0.02 (1.68) mm for Hyaluronic Acid. (22) By using F test and the highest SD=1.68mm to ensure study power, the minimum sample size was calculated to be 10 implants per group.…”

Section: Sample Size Estimationmentioning

confidence: 97%

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Flowable Leukocyte and Platelet–Rich Fibrin versus Hyaluronic Acid as Bioactive Implant Coatings (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Bassiouny,

Abu Brika,

Ezzat

et al. 2024

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: osseointegrated dental implants are often left load-free during the healing period. Many trials have been conducted to improve osteointegration to minimize loading time and ultimately raise patient satisfaction.Aim of the Study: to assess the effectiveness of flowable L-PRF and hyaluronic acid as bioactive coatings for dental implants, to decrease loading time.Material and Methods: 30 sites indicated for implant placement in the mandibular posterior region were selected and divided into 3 groups. In test group I; 10 implants were coated with flowable L-PRF and in test group II; 10 implants were coated with Hyaluronic acid while in the negative control (group III) the remaining 10 implants were left uncoated. After osteotomy; all implants were installed. Clinical assessment of implant stability was carried out immediately post-insertion (primary stability) and then 2 and 3 months post-insertion (secondary stability) using Resonance Frequency Analysis. Radiographic assessment of marginal bone level was evaluated immediately post insertion and 3 months later before loading. Results:The results of this study revealed that implants coated with flowable L-PRF showed less marginal bone loss than those coated with hyaluronic acid or the uncoated ones (median of marginal bone loss at 3rd-month post insertion was 0.35mm, 0.37mm and 0.51mm respectively). On the other hand, implants coated with HA showed better secondary stability at 3rd-month post insertion with a median of (89.50) compared to (82.50) for flowable PRF and (79.00) for the uncoated control group. Conclusion:bioactive implant coatings can enhance osseointegration and decrease loading time.

show abstract

Section: Sample Size Estimationmentioning

confidence: 97%

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Flowable Leukocyte and Platelet–Rich Fibrin versus Hyaluronic Acid as Bioactive Implant Coatings (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Bassiouny,

Abu Brika,

Ezzat

et al. 2024

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effect of Platelet Concentrates on Marginal Bone Loss of Immediate Implant Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: To evaluate marginal bone loss (MBL) in immediate implant procedures (IIP) placed in conjunction with platelet concentrates (PCs) compared to IIP without PCs. Methods: A search was performed in four databases. Clinical trials evaluating MBL of IIP placed with and without PCs were included. The random effects model was conducted for meta-analysis. Results: Eight clinical trials that evaluated MBL in millimeters were included. A total of 148 patients and 232 immediate implants were evaluated. The meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction on MBL of IIP placed with PCs when compared to the non-PCs group at 6 months (p < 0.00001) and 12 months (p < 0.00001) follow-ups. No statistically significant differences were observed on MBL of IIP when compared PCs + bone graft group vs. only bone grafting at 6 months (p = 0.51), and a significant higher MBL of IIP placed with PCs + bone graft when compared to only bone grafting at 12 months was found (p = 0.03). Conclusions: MBL of IIP at 6 and 12 months follow-ups is lower when PCs are applied in comparison to not placing PCs, which may lead to more predictable implant treatments in the medium term. However, MBL seems not to diminish when PCs + bone graft are applied when compared to only bone grafting.

show abstract

Vertical Bone Implant Contact Around Anterior Immediate Implants and Their Stability After Using Either Alloplast or L-PRF or Both in Peri-Implant Gap: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Cited by 2 publications

References 26 publications

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Flowable Leukocyte and Platelet–Rich Fibrin versus Hyaluronic Acid as Bioactive Implant Coatings (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Flowable Leukocyte and Platelet–Rich Fibrin versus Hyaluronic Acid as Bioactive Implant Coatings (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Effect of Platelet Concentrates on Marginal Bone Loss of Immediate Implant Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About