2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2655726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Bargaining and Retail Competition: What Drives Countervailing Power?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 See the web Appendix. 23 The pass-through rates of input prices to retail prices and quantities are provided by Gaudin (2018), when n ≥ 3. 24 In the Appendix, we provide an example with a linear demand system which can be applied to the case where retailers' products are gross complements.…”
Section: Application: Welfare Effects Of Information Exchange Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 See the web Appendix. 23 The pass-through rates of input prices to retail prices and quantities are provided by Gaudin (2018), when n ≥ 3. 24 In the Appendix, we provide an example with a linear demand system which can be applied to the case where retailers' products are gross complements.…”
Section: Application: Welfare Effects Of Information Exchange Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pass‐through rates of input prices to retail prices and quantities are provided by Gaudin (), when n3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Countervailing buyer power claims that greater retail concentration also increases retailers’ bargaining power as buyers of input and thus induces the price of this input to fall. According to this concept, this decrease in the input price is further passed through to consumers and compensates for the price hike due to heightened market power at the retail level (Gaudin, 2015). Here, we consider fixed costs that are the driving force of the countervailing buyer power.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caprice and Rey [2015] show that joint delisting decisions increase the bargaining positions of the group's members. 27 This improved bargaining position can put suppliers in a position 25 Unlike work which adopts a linear form of demand, Gaudin [2018] shows that countervailing buyer power arises in equilibrium for a broad class of demand forms, and its magnitude depends on the degree of product differentiation.…”
Section: Efficiency Concerns Related To Exploitative Abuses: Buyer Pomentioning
confidence: 99%