1999
DOI: 10.2172/8835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical and Kink Mode Stability Calculations for Current Carrying Quasiaxial Stellarators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. The inner target is moved outwards and tilted somewhat less with respect to the magnetic surfaces in order to accommodate a wider range of ITER plasma equilibria with flatter current profiles in the core (l i ≥ 0.6 vs. original 0.85, [2]). Furthermore, the reflector plates connected to the lower ends of the targets are rendered more horizontal in order to avoid direct plasma contact of their leading edges during possible excursions of the separatrix by placing them in the shadow of the reduced dome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The inner target is moved outwards and tilted somewhat less with respect to the magnetic surfaces in order to accommodate a wider range of ITER plasma equilibria with flatter current profiles in the core (l i ≥ 0.6 vs. original 0.85, [2]). Furthermore, the reflector plates connected to the lower ends of the targets are rendered more horizontal in order to avoid direct plasma contact of their leading edges during possible excursions of the separatrix by placing them in the shadow of the reduced dome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details on the kink and vertical stability calculations will be reported in [10]. The CAS3D code has also been used for benchmarking of kink and vertical stability calculations, and to extend kink and vertical stability calculations to the case with the wall at infinity [11,12].…”
Section: Ideal Mhd Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%