1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1989.tb01574.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebral stabilisation for cervical spondylopathy using a screw and washer technique

Abstract: A transvertebral screw and interbody washer technique was used to stabilise the vertebrae and maintain the intervertebral space in 34 adult dobermann pinschers with cervical spondylopathy. The long term success of the procedure was 50 per cent. Pre‐operatively three dogs were considered mildly ataxic, 16 moderately ataxic, 13 severely ataxic and two non‐ambulatory. Thirty dogs had radiographic changes of calcified disc, vertebral malalignment or narrow intervertebral disc space and all dogs had myelographic ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surgeon may also cause iatrogenic spinal cord damage (Read et al, 1983;Lipsitz et al, 2001), vertebral fracture (McKee et al, 1989), induce pneumomediastinum (Marchevsky and Richardson, 1999), perform surgery at the wrong site, or simply fail to understand certain limitations of the technique itself (11.17C). Prolonged or excessive extension of the neck during surgery is undesirable as it causes spinal cord compression (11.10).…”
Section: A Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surgeon may also cause iatrogenic spinal cord damage (Read et al, 1983;Lipsitz et al, 2001), vertebral fracture (McKee et al, 1989), induce pneumomediastinum (Marchevsky and Richardson, 1999), perform surgery at the wrong site, or simply fail to understand certain limitations of the technique itself (11.17C). Prolonged or excessive extension of the neck during surgery is undesirable as it causes spinal cord compression (11.10).…”
Section: A Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small fracture is visible at the ventral aspect of C5 (arrow), presumably due to hyperflexion injury (Bruecker et al, 1989b;McKee et al, 1989). B: Distraction-stabilization were performed using screws and bone cement.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Adamo et al (2007), ventral slot combined with an artificial disc prosthesis was better able to mimic the behavior of intact cadaver spines compared to ventral slot alone or the pin-polymethylmethacrylate technique. the initial and permanent distraction of the affected intervertebral disc space without the common complication of vertebral end plate failure-resorption and consequent loss of distraction (McKee et al, 1989;Rusbridge et al, 1998;McKee et al, 1999). The use of polymethylmethacrylate by itself carries a risk for complications, e.g., oesophageal eruption or thermal damage to the spinal cord.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,6 Many different surgical techniques h a ve been used to treat CDDV, i n volving either direct decompre s s i o n alone by fenestration and a ventral slot over the affected IVDD, or decompre ssion by linear traction combined with intervertebral stabilisation. [2][3][4][5]7 Only the latter techniques address the primary pathophysiology of the condition. T h e re p o rted success rates for distraction/ stabilisation pro c e d u res are 70% to 90%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T h e re p o rted success rates for distraction/ stabilisation pro c e d u res are 70% to 90%. [2][3][4][5]7 Despite initial success, deterioration may occur weeks to months after n e u rological re c ove ry. Most commonly this is secondary to domino effect wher e a dynamic compre s s i ve lesion deve l o p s at an adjacent IVDS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%