1992
DOI: 10.1097/00006231-199206000-00042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebral metastases and an equivocal bone scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plausible explanations for false negative findings are pure osteolytic lesions growing rapidly, when bone turnover is slow, or when the site is avascular. Hence in case of equivocal findings alternative methods in terms of traditional needle biopsy [9] or more recently magnetic resonance imaging [10] can be used for diagnosis. Sometimes abnormal biochemistry can indicate bony metastases e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plausible explanations for false negative findings are pure osteolytic lesions growing rapidly, when bone turnover is slow, or when the site is avascular. Hence in case of equivocal findings alternative methods in terms of traditional needle biopsy [9] or more recently magnetic resonance imaging [10] can be used for diagnosis. Sometimes abnormal biochemistry can indicate bony metastases e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Correlation of bone scanning with other radiological exams may be required to increase the specificity and accuracy of identification of the etiology of bony lesions. [7][8][9][10] Similarly, other radiologic imaging modalities are usually needed, in conjunction with bone scanning, for evaluation of response to treatment in bony metastases. [11][12][13] The value of single photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT-CT) for evaluating bone lesions on bone scans has been investigated in different regions of the body and for different indications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early and objective assessment of the response to therapy in this group of patients is therefore important, so that if a patient has failed to respond, the treatment can be altered. MR imaging, being a highly sensitive technique in detection of bone metastases (2–4, 13, 14, 16), is also promising for accurate assessment of the therapeutic response of bone metastases. Different MR techniques have been studied in this regard (6, 7, 27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%