2020
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebral Intraosseous Vascular Malformations in a Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Population: Prevalence, Histologic Features, and Associations With CNS Disease

Abstract: OBJECTIVE.-The purpose of this study was to investigate whether MRI-typical and MRIatypical intraosseous vascular malformations are associated with familial cerebral cavernous malformation (FCCM). MATERIALS AND METHODS.-In a retrospective matched case-control study, two radiologists reviewed the spinal imaging, both CT and MRI, of 22 patients with FCCM seen between 2006 and 2017 and of age-and sex-matched control subjects for MRI-typical and MRIatypical intraosseous vascular malformations. Quantitative analysi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found a high prevalence of vertebral intraosseous vascular malformations (69%), including atypical (T1 hypointense) intraosseous vascular malformation in approximately 38% of the patients who underwent MR imaging screening, supporting the recent finding that these are common in patients with familial CCM. 22 Many of the SCCMs that we found with screening were quite small (mean diameter of 2.52 mm) and we would not expect them to currently alter patient management. SCCMs were not commonly clinically discovered in our larger cohort (23/280 patients, 8.2%), and presenting with spinal cord hemorrhage (n ¼ 7) and being operated on for SCCM (n ¼ 7) were even rarer in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also found a high prevalence of vertebral intraosseous vascular malformations (69%), including atypical (T1 hypointense) intraosseous vascular malformation in approximately 38% of the patients who underwent MR imaging screening, supporting the recent finding that these are common in patients with familial CCM. 22 Many of the SCCMs that we found with screening were quite small (mean diameter of 2.52 mm) and we would not expect them to currently alter patient management. SCCMs were not commonly clinically discovered in our larger cohort (23/280 patients, 8.2%), and presenting with spinal cord hemorrhage (n ¼ 7) and being operated on for SCCM (n ¼ 7) were even rarer in our cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We also recorded and characterized any vertebral intraosseous vascular malformations on screening MR imaging as these have recently been reported to be of high prevalence in patients with CCM. 22 We tested whether SCCM counts were associated with age and total brain CCM count by using the Spearman rank correlation.…”
Section: Screening Spinal Cord Mr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familial CCM cases also display cavernous malformations outside the brain, including in the bone, spine, adrenal glands, and skin (Campione et al, 2013 ; Haghighi et al, 2013 ; Manole et al, 2020 ; Sirvente et al, 2009 ; Strickland et al, 2017 ; Tandberg et al, 2020 ; Toll et al, 2009 ). Specifically, among familial cases with CCM1 / KRIT1 , cutaneous lesions reported include congenital hyperkeratotic capillary‐venous malformations (HCCVMs), punctate capillary malformations (PCMs), and deep blue nodules (DBNs) (Manole et al, 2020 ; Sirvente et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IOVMs may demonstrate an atypical appearance on MR imaging when relatively lipid-poor and may also exhibit a more aggressive-type behavior, leading to softtissue extension, cortical expansion, and potentially pathologic fracture. [21][22][23] Some authors postulate that aggressive features are more commonly seen in underlying combined capillary-venous malformations, particularly in the familial cerebral cavernous malformation population. 22 The presence of other features such as homogeneous soft-tissue enhancement, honeycomb pattern of internal trabeculation, T1 hyperintensity, absence of periosteal reaction and lack of erosive change, help to support the correct diagnosis despite otherwise atypical features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] Some authors postulate that aggressive features are more commonly seen in underlying combined capillary-venous malformations, particularly in the familial cerebral cavernous malformation population. 22 The presence of other features such as homogeneous soft-tissue enhancement, honeycomb pattern of internal trabeculation, T1 hyperintensity, absence of periosteal reaction and lack of erosive change, help to support the correct diagnosis despite otherwise atypical features. 2,[24][25][26][27] Such lesions can still be referred to as IOVMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%