The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Versatility vs stability. Are the assets of metal–organic frameworks deployable in aqueous acidic and basic media?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The poor water stability of many MOFs has been a bottleneck in the deployment of this class of materials for water sorption, while the structural designability of the frameworks permitted extensive research and hence the development of various chemically stable MOFs. The mechanistic explanations for the stability of different classes of MOFs upon exposure to water under various conditions have been explained in the literature . Due to the possibility of varying MOFs’ building units and hence the degree of hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity, a range of water sorption isotherm behavior is observed for the adsorbents.…”
Section: Water Adsorption By Different Classes Of Porous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The poor water stability of many MOFs has been a bottleneck in the deployment of this class of materials for water sorption, while the structural designability of the frameworks permitted extensive research and hence the development of various chemically stable MOFs. The mechanistic explanations for the stability of different classes of MOFs upon exposure to water under various conditions have been explained in the literature . Due to the possibility of varying MOFs’ building units and hence the degree of hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity, a range of water sorption isotherm behavior is observed for the adsorbents.…”
Section: Water Adsorption By Different Classes Of Porous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanistic explanations for the stability of different classes of MOFs upon exposure to water under various conditions have been explained in the literature. 152 Due to the possibility of varying MOFs' building units and hence the degree of hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity, a range of water sorption isotherm behavior is observed for the adsorbents. The watersorption isotherms vary widely in shapes, the onset of water loading, steepness, hysteresis, and inflection point.…”
Section: Water Adsorption By Different Classes Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, fine-tuning the pore aperture size, which is of major interest in gas separation and capture, is now possible contrary to other inorganic solid adsorbents, such as zeolites, inorganic oxides, and porous carbon-based materials. Overall, the versatile properties of MOFs make them highly competitive materials in many fields and, in particular, to address societal and environmental issues. ,, , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past two decades, extensive work has been performed on the synthesis and study of materials known as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which have emerged as a new family of crystalline hybrid organic/inorganic porous materials with outstanding performance in various potential applications including catalysis, , adsorption, sensing, and so on, due to their fascinating properties such as ultrahigh surface area, tunable porosity, and excellent thermal and chemical stability. However, in some cases, their microsized pores and narrow channels inherently restrict their adsorption capacity. ,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%