1997
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900120075012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Versatility of the Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
124
0
12

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
124
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Perforators involving both the intermuscular septum and either the rectus femoris or vastus lateralis muscles (musculoseptocutaneous) were found throughout the distribution. The midpoint perforator was found at the precise midpoint only 16.0% of the time, and, as shown in Figure 5, considerable variation in perforator location was found relative to the midpoint. However, 47.0% were found nearby within a surrounding distance of ±2% of the thigh length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Perforators involving both the intermuscular septum and either the rectus femoris or vastus lateralis muscles (musculoseptocutaneous) were found throughout the distribution. The midpoint perforator was found at the precise midpoint only 16.0% of the time, and, as shown in Figure 5, considerable variation in perforator location was found relative to the midpoint. However, 47.0% were found nearby within a surrounding distance of ±2% of the thigh length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[15][16][17]20,23 This technique offers many advantages such as large and pliable skin paddle, long vascular pedicle with a large diameter, and suitability for a simultaneous 2-team approach. Additionally, when compared with the radial forearm flap, the ALT flap sacrifices no major artery, and the donor-site defect can usually be closed primarily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18] At the teams' medical facility, the ALT flap is the workhorse flap for reconstructing complex skin and mucosa defects after head and neck tumor resection. [19][20][21] Additionally, this flap has the following advantages over the radial forearm flap: (1) sacrifice of major arteries in the hand is not required, and (2) the donor-site scar is less conspicuous than that of the radial forearm flap.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published data suggest that the width of the ALT flap should range from 6 to 10 cm to allow primary wound closure. (42)(43)(44) However, these approaches are not reliable, as they do not take individual variability and the overall circumference of the donor thigh into consid- …”
Section: Anterolateral Thigh Flapmentioning
confidence: 99%