2011
DOI: 10.1002/micr.20847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Versatility of perforator‐based V‐Y advancement flaps in reconstruction of complex mid back wounds

Abstract: Reconstruction of complex mid back wounds is challenging due to the patient comorbidities and scarcity of reliable regional flap alternatives. Four consecutive cases treated with perforator based V-Y advancement flaps are reported. An effective repair was achieved in all the patients and the mean follow up period was 28 months. Our results indicate the efficacy of adipocutaneous flaps in complex spinal soft tissue repair and may help to refine the relevant algorhythm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have described successful use of fasciocutaneous flaps supplied by perforators in the lumbosacral region, with the major advantage of preserving muscle function. 23,24 The 3 patients who were reconstructed with fasciocutaneous perforator flaps in our series all underwent posterior-only partial sacrectomies and had overall favorable results. Two of 3 patients healed with no postoperative complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several studies have described successful use of fasciocutaneous flaps supplied by perforators in the lumbosacral region, with the major advantage of preserving muscle function. 23,24 The 3 patients who were reconstructed with fasciocutaneous perforator flaps in our series all underwent posterior-only partial sacrectomies and had overall favorable results. Two of 3 patients healed with no postoperative complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The average level of evidence was 4.29, with 4 level 3 studies, 32 level 4 studies, and 20 level 5 studies. Multiple options for reconstruction were described including free style perforator flap, 39 lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap, 6,8,1012 paraspinous muscle flap, 2,1317 SGAP, 10,14,1822 inferior gluteal artery perforator, 19 intercostal artery perforator flap, 8,10,11,20,23,24 gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap, 1,2,13,2529 reverse latissimus dorsi flap, 2,7,13,27,3035 lateral intercostal artery perforator–based latissimus dorsi flap, 36 external oblique musculocutaneous pedicled flap, 37 pedicled omental flap, 3840 free flap, 7,13,14,4155 and total leg flap. 56 The most frequently described method of lumbar wound reconstruction was free flap with 18 articles, followed by reverse latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction with 10 articles (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%