2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b06713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards Interlaboratory Study on Measuring the Thickness and Chemistry of Nanoparticle Coatings Using XPS and LEIS

Abstract: We report the results of a VAMAS (Versailles Project on Advanced Materials and Standards) inter-laboratory study on the measurement of the shell thickness and chemistry of nanoparticle coatings. Peptide-coated gold particles were supplied to laboratories in two forms: a colloidal suspension in pure water and; particles dried onto a silicon wafer. Participants prepared and analyzed these samples using either X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or low energy ion scattering (LEIS). Careful data analysis reveal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the starting AuNPs should not be assumed to be completely "bare", which could be related to the presence of organic shells on solution-synthesized AuNPs and their interactions with PLL chains on the substrate. Assuming a well-defined state for as-received AuNPs that are nominally covered only with a weakly bound citrate shell is notoriously difficult, in part because they can easily become contaminated with other adsorbates at levels detectable by sensitive techniques [34][35][36]. Upon exposure to the ambient environment, adventitious organic contamination will be present on both nominally bare and peptide functionalized gold surfaces in the amounts at least comparable to those of the intentionally immobilized molecules [37,38], thus further diminishing the difference in refractive index surrounding the "bare" vs biofunctionalized AuNPs in the experiments.…”
Section: Ellipsometric Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the starting AuNPs should not be assumed to be completely "bare", which could be related to the presence of organic shells on solution-synthesized AuNPs and their interactions with PLL chains on the substrate. Assuming a well-defined state for as-received AuNPs that are nominally covered only with a weakly bound citrate shell is notoriously difficult, in part because they can easily become contaminated with other adsorbates at levels detectable by sensitive techniques [34][35][36]. Upon exposure to the ambient environment, adventitious organic contamination will be present on both nominally bare and peptide functionalized gold surfaces in the amounts at least comparable to those of the intentionally immobilized molecules [37,38], thus further diminishing the difference in refractive index surrounding the "bare" vs biofunctionalized AuNPs in the experiments.…”
Section: Ellipsometric Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interlaboratory comparison conducted by Belsey et al 73 . demonstrated the challenges associated with the movement of material from solution for XPS or other surface analysis.…”
Section: Provenance Information and Data Records For Nano-objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also desirable to have a consistent and standardised approach to calibration to enable the direct comparison of XPS data between different instruments and institutions. The fact that this is not done, and that different manufacturers adopt different procedures, was highlighted in two recent VAMAS interlaboratory studies on nanoparticle coating analysis and composition measurement in organic depth profiling . In these studies, the XPS composition values reported by participants varied by a factor of two from the mean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%