2014
DOI: 10.1177/0767370114549908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vers un modèle de formation de la valeur perçue d’une innovation :le rôle majeur des bénéfices perçus en amont du processus d’adoption

Abstract: Afin de mieux comprendre le comportement du consommateur lors des premières phases d'interaction avec un nouveau produit, un modèle de formation de la valeur perçue d'une innovation est proposé et testé. L'étude quantitative, menée dans le secteur automobile auprès de 828 individus, démontre qu'en amont du processus d'adoption, la valeur perçue d'une nouveauté est seulement influencée par ses bénéfices perçus mais n'est pas affectée par ses sacrifices perçus. De même, les variables individuelles n'influencent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its theoretical and methodological limitations (Gallarza et al, 2011), value is a rich avenue of consumer analysis (Kumar and Reinartz, 2016), notably because its formation results from the interaction between an individual and an object/service. Two streams of analysis structure the literature on value formation (Rivière, 2015). The first, called “restrictive aggregate,” is associated with the conception of Zeithaml (1988).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite its theoretical and methodological limitations (Gallarza et al, 2011), value is a rich avenue of consumer analysis (Kumar and Reinartz, 2016), notably because its formation results from the interaction between an individual and an object/service. Two streams of analysis structure the literature on value formation (Rivière, 2015). The first, called “restrictive aggregate,” is associated with the conception of Zeithaml (1988).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the analytical framework of perceived value takes into account both the positive and negative valences associated with the use of an offer, it is well adapted to the smart offer context (Kumar and Reinartz, 2016; Rivière and Mencarelli, 2012). Furthermore, the perceived value perspective is particularly interesting owing to its strong power to predict the adoption of an innovation (Kim et al, 2007; Kleijnen et al, 2007; Rivière, 2015), contrary to the perceived quality and satisfaction approaches, which have major limitations (Rivière and Mencarelli, 2012). Finally, Aurier et al (2004) maintain that understanding sources of value can help marketers identify the elements of an offer to highlight during marketing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies examine the effects of learning costs, which in particular influence product adoption (Jeannot and Jolibert, 2013; Rivière, 2015), first use (Lakshmanan and Krishnan, 2011), long-term use (Billeter et al, 2011; Murray and Häubl, 2007) and satisfaction (Aubert and Gotteland, 2010; Wood and Lynch, 2002). Anticipation of learning costs can also generate anxiety about using a product (Wood and Moreau, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies focus on the elements that influence the evaluation of these costs: product nature (Gill, 2008; Rajagopal and Burnkant, 2009), functionalities (Thompson et al, 2005) or an individuals’ competency level (Billeter et al, 2011; Burson, 2007). Others deal with the effects of learning costs on the perceived value of the product (Rivière, 2015) or its adoption (Castano et al, 2008; Hamilton and Thompson, 2007). Some researchers look at the types of learning necessary in order to use a product and show that it is either continuous or discontinuous (Lakshmanan et al, 2010; Lakshmanan and Krishnan, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%