“…Very tactful, he was kind and caring with his patients and was good at comforting them [1]. Hans Pichler died on February 3 1949 in Vienna [12] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Hans Pichler (1877-1949)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He was professor of Oral Surgery at Harvard Medical School in 1922 and professor of plastic surgery at Harvard Medical School in 1941. He was appointed professor emeritus of plastic surgery at the Harvard Medical School in 1947 [3,12] (Figure 2).…”
Passing through Europe for congresses in London and Paris in 1931, Kazanjian initially refused. Brunswick consequently asked for Princess Maria of Greece's help and she agreed. Kazanjian finally accepted and made a detour through Vienna on July 31 and August 1. He saw the philosopher on those two days at Pichler's dental office. On August 3, Freud wrote in his diary: "Something unbelievable happened! Within a day and a half, the magician made a prosthesis which is less intrusive and heavy than all the others and with which I can chew, talk and smoke like before [3]. With his own hands, he made three prostheses in Pichler's laboratory with the supplies that Princess Maria had sent him. Freud knew that Kazanjian could hardly help him more [5]. At a later date, Kazanjian said to one of his colleagues that there was little hope of the prosthesis being successful. Kaznajian left Vienna on August 29. On August 30 1931, Freud wrote: "The magician left yesterday. I do not feel as great as before but I can speak more easily. It will be difficult to do any more for me [3].
“…Very tactful, he was kind and caring with his patients and was good at comforting them [1]. Hans Pichler died on February 3 1949 in Vienna [12] (Figure 1).…”
Section: Hans Pichler (1877-1949)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He was professor of Oral Surgery at Harvard Medical School in 1922 and professor of plastic surgery at Harvard Medical School in 1941. He was appointed professor emeritus of plastic surgery at the Harvard Medical School in 1947 [3,12] (Figure 2).…”
Passing through Europe for congresses in London and Paris in 1931, Kazanjian initially refused. Brunswick consequently asked for Princess Maria of Greece's help and she agreed. Kazanjian finally accepted and made a detour through Vienna on July 31 and August 1. He saw the philosopher on those two days at Pichler's dental office. On August 3, Freud wrote in his diary: "Something unbelievable happened! Within a day and a half, the magician made a prosthesis which is less intrusive and heavy than all the others and with which I can chew, talk and smoke like before [3]. With his own hands, he made three prostheses in Pichler's laboratory with the supplies that Princess Maria had sent him. Freud knew that Kazanjian could hardly help him more [5]. At a later date, Kazanjian said to one of his colleagues that there was little hope of the prosthesis being successful. Kaznajian left Vienna on August 29. On August 30 1931, Freud wrote: "The magician left yesterday. I do not feel as great as before but I can speak more easily. It will be difficult to do any more for me [3].
“…Since Freud was a habitual cocaine user we hypothesized that his condition could be attributed to the necrotizing effect of cocaine abuse. Other authors have theorized that Freud actually suffered from verrucous squamous cell carcinoma [4], a clinico-pathological entity that was first recognized a few years after Freud's death [5]. Indeed, considering the historical accounts reviewed in both works, a diagnosis of verrucous squamous cell carcinoma can be reasonably taken into account.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we do not share the absolute confidence in this hypothesis shown by its advocates in their comment to our communication as we are, likewise, not unconditionally convinced about our theory. Indeed, both diagnoses have been proposed posthumously without having access to the histopathological specimens and solely based on historical accounts [1,4]. Available data do not provide conclusive evidence in favor of neither verrucous carcinoma nor cocaine-induced lesion [1,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, both diagnoses have been proposed posthumously without having access to the histopathological specimens and solely based on historical accounts [1,4]. Available data do not provide conclusive evidence in favor of neither verrucous carcinoma nor cocaine-induced lesion [1,4]. It can be reasonably affirmed that in the absence of further conclusive evidence, such as histopathological revision of surgical specimens, both theories deserve to be taken into consideration.…”
Since more than 5聽years, it becomes evident that there is a new group of patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck area, namely human papillomavirus (HPV)-related (caused) tumors. As clinical statistics indicate, those patients have better prognosis, even despite more advanced stage compared to those with HPV-negative tumors. In fact, as a surrogate of HPV infection for clinical studies, an immunohistochemical expression of p16 protein is used. In the following chapter, the spectrum of squamous cell carcinomas variants with indication of the percentage cases with proved HPV infection will be presented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.