1991
DOI: 10.1002/mawe.19910221002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verminderung des Verformungsvermögens bei mehrachsigen Spannungszuständen unter Kriechbeanspruchung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for these different findings was possibly the small part of left-handers in all of the current large-scale studies with a mean of 50 left-handed, ranging from 22 to 120 (Crosby et al, 1994;Ewald and Kohler 1991;Hanten et al, 1999;Harth and Vetter 1994;Massy-Westropp et al, 2004;Mathiowetz et al, 1985). Such sample sizes are probably not large enough to sufficiently discuss influenced hand strength in this special part of the population multifactorially and the percentage of 7.3% left-handed in our study group is too small to establish reference values for leftdominant people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for these different findings was possibly the small part of left-handers in all of the current large-scale studies with a mean of 50 left-handed, ranging from 22 to 120 (Crosby et al, 1994;Ewald and Kohler 1991;Hanten et al, 1999;Harth and Vetter 1994;Massy-Westropp et al, 2004;Mathiowetz et al, 1985). Such sample sizes are probably not large enough to sufficiently discuss influenced hand strength in this special part of the population multifactorially and the percentage of 7.3% left-handed in our study group is too small to establish reference values for leftdominant people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…1) Gilbertson and Barber-Lomax 1994;Hanten et al, 1999;Harth and Vetter 1994;Massy-Westropp et al, 2004;Mathiowetz et al, 1985), the percentage of left-handed participants Ewald and Kohler 1991;Hanten et al, 1999;Harth and Vetter 1994;MassyWestropp et al, 2004;Mathiowetz et al, 1985), and the influence of gender, height and weight on grip and pinch strength (Crosby et al, 1994;Gilbertson and Barber-Lomax 1994;Hanten et al, 1999;Harth and Vetter 1994;Mathiowetz et al, 1985). It becomes apparent that these characteristics do not vary between different populations, suggesting a cultural independent age and gender related distribution of hand strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Focusing on hand dominance in current large scale investigations, the difference between the strength scores of right and left-dominant people varies from -2.8% to 18% and -6.5% to 4.4% for grip and pinch strength respectively (Crosby et al, 1994;Ewald and Kohler 1991;Hanten et al, 1999;Harth and Vetter 1994;Mathiowetz et al, 1985). The reason for these different findings was possibly the small part of left-handers in all of the current large-scale studies with a mean of 50 left-handed, ranging from 22 to 120 (Crosby et al, 1994;Ewald and Kohler 1991;Hanten et al, 1999;Harth and Vetter 1994;Massy-Westropp et al, 2004;Mathiowetz et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%