SMC'98 Conference Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.98CH36218)
DOI: 10.1109/icsmc.1998.725410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verifying SDL programs using Petri nets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Verification of static and dynamic properties of the system in SDT is performed by exhaustive or partial model-checking on the equivalent FSM produced by the combination of control states and data values. For complex SDL specifications, compositional verification and reliance on other formalisms (i.e., LOTOS [16], Spin [17,18], and Petri Nets [19], which are introduced in later sections) have also been suggested. The lack of adequate freeware tool support for validation prompts the research for alternative solutions, that is, translators of SDL to other formal notations.…”
Section: Critical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verification of static and dynamic properties of the system in SDT is performed by exhaustive or partial model-checking on the equivalent FSM produced by the combination of control states and data values. For complex SDL specifications, compositional verification and reliance on other formalisms (i.e., LOTOS [16], Spin [17,18], and Petri Nets [19], which are introduced in later sections) have also been suggested. The lack of adequate freeware tool support for validation prompts the research for alternative solutions, that is, translators of SDL to other formal notations.…”
Section: Critical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%