2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45484-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification within the KARO Agent Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Representing Cognitive States section, apart from the references mentioned, there are many other approaches: in the KARO framework (van Linder, van der Hoek, and Meyer 1998) for instance, epistemic logic and dynamic logic are combined (there is work on programming KARO agents [Meyer et al 2001] and on verifying them [Hustadt et al 2001]). Moreover, where we indicated in the logical toolkit above how epistemic notions can have natural "group variants," Aldewereld, van der Hoek, and Meyer (2004) define some group proattitudes in the KARO setting.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Representing Cognitive States section, apart from the references mentioned, there are many other approaches: in the KARO framework (van Linder, van der Hoek, and Meyer 1998) for instance, epistemic logic and dynamic logic are combined (there is work on programming KARO agents [Meyer et al 2001] and on verifying them [Hustadt et al 2001]). Moreover, where we indicated in the logical toolkit above how epistemic notions can have natural "group variants," Aldewereld, van der Hoek, and Meyer (2004) define some group proattitudes in the KARO setting.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, although deductive and rewriting approaches have been developed [71,85,2,53,1,7,26] it is the techniques based on model-checking that have been particularly popular [14,21,138,75,13,74,90,87,89]. Work in this area has led to a variety of different practical agent verification systems.…”
Section: Agent Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both resolution-and tableau-based proof methods for combinations of propositional (linear or branching time) temporal logics with modal logics [54,53,193,94] have been studied. For example, the combination of modal and temporal logics and translations into fragments of classical first-order logics have been used to reason about the KARO agent framework [96], and about extensions of the basic METATEM framework [71].…”
Section: • Temporal Logicsmentioning
confidence: 99%