2003
DOI: 10.1002/fld.568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification testing in computational fluid dynamics: an example using Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes methods for two‐dimensional flow in the near wake of a circular cylinder

Abstract: SUMMARYVeriÿcation testing was performed for various Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes methods for uniform ow past a circular cylinder at Re = 5232. The standard and renormalized group (RNG) versions of the k-method were examined, along with the Boussinesq, Speziale and Launder constitutive relationships. Wind tunnel experiments for ow past a circular cylinder were also performed to obtain a comparative data set. Preliminary studies demonstrate poor convergence for the Speziale relationship.Veriÿcation testing w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system of equations is solved using FIDAP v.8.6.2 on an IBM 933 MHz processor PC, an SGI Origin 2400 with 48-400 MHz processors, and a Sun workstation with Ultra Sparc III dual 900 MHz processors. Details of the airflow simulation are described in Richmond-Bryant (2003a) and are summarized here. To take advantage of steady-state symmetry, the velocity field is solved over a half-plane, semi-circular grid.…”
Section: Rans Airflow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system of equations is solved using FIDAP v.8.6.2 on an IBM 933 MHz processor PC, an SGI Origin 2400 with 48-400 MHz processors, and a Sun workstation with Ultra Sparc III dual 900 MHz processors. Details of the airflow simulation are described in Richmond-Bryant (2003a) and are summarized here. To take advantage of steady-state symmetry, the velocity field is solved over a half-plane, semi-circular grid.…”
Section: Rans Airflow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the wake region at x/D = 1.0 and x/D = 1.5, while some differences are observed between profiles obtained with t * = 0.002 and 0.001, predictions with a smaller time step of t * = 0.0005 do not significantly differ from those of t * = 0.001 . Moreover, with reference to the methodology discussed in Richmond-Bryant [13], global relative two-norm error for streamwise velocity is calculated for 5000 points located in the region −1 x/D 3, 0 y/D 1. The error resulting from increasing the time step from t * = 0.001 to t * = 0.002 is 6.03×10 −4 , and from t * = 0.0005 to t * = 0.001 is 2.06×10 −4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further increase up to x u /D = 18.3 resulted in negligible changes. Richmond-Bryant [13] presented a numerical work providing a verification study of Reynoldsaveraged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods for the problem of airflow past a circular cylinder at Re = 5232. She examined the standard and renormalized group (RNG) versions of the k-model, along with the Boussinesq [14] and Craft et al [15] stress strain-rate relation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this, the isotropic eddy viscosity concept, on which the standard k − ε turbulence model is based, is known to produce unrealistically high turbulent kinetic energy (k) upstream of the bluff body that causes late separation and subsequent suppression of the near wake. (20,21) Therefore, the suitability of the standard k − ε turbulence model in conjunction with the standard wall function formulation is dubious and may point to further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%