1942
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1942.9917102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of the Heinis Mental Growth Curve on Results with the Stanford-Binet Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1944
1944
1947
1947

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuhlmann (28) found that the Heinis personal constant was as applicable to Stanford-Binet as to his own scale and yielded more constant values on retesting than the IQ. DeForest (14) compared Merrill-Palmer and Minnesota Pre-school Tests and found both correlated about r = .55 with later Binet.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kuhlmann (28) found that the Heinis personal constant was as applicable to Stanford-Binet as to his own scale and yielded more constant values on retesting than the IQ. DeForest (14) compared Merrill-Palmer and Minnesota Pre-school Tests and found both correlated about r = .55 with later Binet.…”
Section: Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Not only is the child incapable of catching up with his age-mates, but the older he grows, the greater will be the discrepancy between his mental development and theirs. There are many studies showing a consistent decrease in IQ with age (12,13,19). Of course, these results are subject to the same ambiguity of interpretation as those already discussed on pages 154-156 showing the age decreases in isolated rural environments.…”
Section: Research Evidence On Important Problemsmentioning
confidence: 98%