2021
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of the delivered patient radiation dose for non‐coplanar beam therapy

Abstract: Purpose: There is an increased interest in using non-coplanar beams for radiotherapy, including SBRT and SRS. This approach can significantly reduce doses to organs-at-risk, however, it requires stringent quality assurance, especially when a dynamic treatment couch is used. In this work, new functionality that allows using non-coplanar beam arrangements in addition to conventional coplanar beams was added and validated to the previously developed in vivo dose verification system.Methods: The existing program c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CCMB inhouse method was validated for in vivo dose reconstruction on 4D CT data sets using a dynamic thorax phantom and lung tumour insert [36] showing a gamma pass rate (3%, 3 mm DTA) within the PTV of >99.3%. The method was also validated for non-coplanar beam configurations such as those used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain treatments [37], using an IMRT QA phantom with irradiations delivered via XML scripting in research mode on a TrueBeam linac (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), achieving gamma pass rates (2%, 2 mm DTA) >97%.…”
Section: Validation Of Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CCMB inhouse method was validated for in vivo dose reconstruction on 4D CT data sets using a dynamic thorax phantom and lung tumour insert [36] showing a gamma pass rate (3%, 3 mm DTA) within the PTV of >99.3%. The method was also validated for non-coplanar beam configurations such as those used in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) brain treatments [37], using an IMRT QA phantom with irradiations delivered via XML scripting in research mode on a TrueBeam linac (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA), achieving gamma pass rates (2%, 2 mm DTA) >97%.…”
Section: Validation Of Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty in the tools available for early IMRT techniques motivated proponents to contend that it was vital to do full 3D dose assessment of the deliveries during a clinic's IMRT commissioning and, perhaps, even for every patient before treatment [46,51] (and encouraged the development of the IC3Ddose community). With time the treatment planning algorithms were better validated, the treatment unit control systems improved, and more efficient alternate patient specific QA was developed using detector arrays [52,53] or Electronic Portal Imaging Devices (EPIDs) [54][55][56][57][58] so that the requirement for regularly performed full 3D dosimetry diminished. Currently such patient specific delivery validation is considered part of a tiered RT QA environment often illustrated as a multi-layered pyramid (see figure 2) [59,60].…”
Section: Implication For Quality Assurance Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%