2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of the brain network marker of major depressive disorder: Test-retest reliability and anterograde generalization performance for newly acquired data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Against the concerns on session variability of rsfMRI, we reduced the variability and improved generalisability to independent validation cohorts through spatial averaging of 100 classifiers, each analysing tens of FCs. Furthermore, a previous study 45 revealed that test–retest reliability was acceptable with the same methodology as demonstrated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Against the concerns on session variability of rsfMRI, we reduced the variability and improved generalisability to independent validation cohorts through spatial averaging of 100 classifiers, each analysing tens of FCs. Furthermore, a previous study 45 revealed that test–retest reliability was acceptable with the same methodology as demonstrated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This achievement was possible through bi-directional (prospective and retrospective) harmonisation, which enabled the extraction of the disease factor itself, and with optimised machine learning method. Against the concerns on session variability of rsfMRI, our previous study 35 revealed that test-retest reliability was acceptable with the same methodology as demonstrated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Against the concerns on session variability of rsfMRI, we reduced the variability and improved generalisability to independent validation cohorts through spatial averaging of 100 classi ers, each analysing tens of FCs. Furthermore, a previous study 45 revealed that test-retest reliability was acceptable with the same methodology as demonstrated in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although altered functional connections between patient groups and healthy controls have been identified [30][31][32][33] , the individual-level classifications can be only achieved with the help of the machine-learning algortihms. In our multicenter study, we successfully developed major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) biomarkers using ensemble sparse classifiers, which generalized well across data from various centers [18][19][20] and maintained consistent performance on new data (anterograde generalization) 34 . However, its discrimination ability evaluated with completely independent datasets, with areas under the curve of 0.74, 0.82, and 0.66-0.81 for MDD, SCZ, and ASD, respectively, may not yet meet high standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted April 2, 2024. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.01.587535 doi: bioRxiv preprint schizophrenia (SCZ), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) biomarkers using ensemble sparse classifiers, which generalized well across data from various centers [18][19][20] and maintained consistent performance on new data (anterograde generalization) 34 . However, its discrimination ability evaluated with completely independent datasets, with areas under the curve of 0.74, 0.82, and 0.66-0.81 for MDD, SCZ, and ASD, respectively, may not yet meet high standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%