2012
DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2011.567422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of stochastic models of window opening behaviour for residential buildings

Abstract: Based on the analyses of data from two distinct measurement campaigns conducted in residential indoor environments in Japan and Switzerland, we identify the specificities of occupants' behaviour with respect to their interactions with windows, including the choice of opening angles for axial openings. As a first step, each dataset is analysed to develop separate predictive models which account for the specificities of window usage in the residential context. The predictive accuracy of these models is then chal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
76
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
10
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the occupants' operation of windows, air conditioning systems and heating systems (such as window opening, timer settings and choice of thermostat set-points) that affect hygrothermal conditions, indoor air quality, light, noise and temperature (Guerra Santin, Itard, and Visscher 2009;Hoes et al 2009;Schweiker et al 2012). It also includes the use of services within the building, such as hot water, cooking and electrical appliances, which consume energy and generate internal heat gains (Isaksson and Karlsson 2006;Yamaguchi, Fujimoto, and Shimoda 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the occupants' operation of windows, air conditioning systems and heating systems (such as window opening, timer settings and choice of thermostat set-points) that affect hygrothermal conditions, indoor air quality, light, noise and temperature (Guerra Santin, Itard, and Visscher 2009;Hoes et al 2009;Schweiker et al 2012). It also includes the use of services within the building, such as hot water, cooking and electrical appliances, which consume energy and generate internal heat gains (Isaksson and Karlsson 2006;Yamaguchi, Fujimoto, and Shimoda 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Existing comprehensive stochastic models for window opening and solar shading control in a residential environment are not sufficiently described or validated, in contrast to the models for offices (Warren & Parkins, 1984;Fritsch et al , 1990;Johnson & Long, 2005;Rijal et al , 2008Rijal et al , , 2011Yun & Steemers, 2008;Yun et al , 2009;Yun & Steemers, 2010;Haldi & Robinson, 2011;Schweiker et al , 2012;Andersen et al , 2013;Yun et al , 2009;Guerra-santin & Itard, 2010;Haldi & Robinson, 2011). …”
Section: Prior Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haldi and Robinson (2009) compared twelve window opening models and found the most effective at predicting window openings in offices to be a hybrid model, this was later validated against residential buildings Schweiker et al (2012). This hybrid model first predicts transitions in opening status using a presence-dependent Markov chain and then in the cases of transitions to the open state, predicts the duration for which the window stays open using a Weibull distribution.…”
Section: Window Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon opening survival duration is calculated ( EnergyPlus an external schedule for windows is created, setting the value to be either 1 for fully open or 0 for fully closed for each time step (in the future it would be useful to include predictions of opening proportion, based for example on the model described in Schweiker et al (2012)). …”
Section: Window Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%