2006
DOI: 10.1093/ietisy/e89-d.3.931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of Speech Recognition Results Incorporating In-domain Confidence and Discourse Coherence Measures

Abstract: Conventional confidence measures for assessing the reliability of ASR (automatic speech recognition) output are typically derived from "low-level" information which is obtained during speech recognition decoding. In contrast to these approaches, we propose a novel utterance verification framework which incorporates "high-level" knowledge sources. Specifically, we investigate two measures: in-domain confidence, the degree of match between the input utterance and the application domain of the back-end system, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result denotes that there is room to improve the accuracy of the first keyword list. Lane and Kawahara (2006) have proposed a method that incorporates not only “low‐level” information (e.g., linguistic likelihood) but also “high‐level” knowledge, i.e., discourse coherence measures. We are currently pursuing a method of estimation of speech intentions (Iwashita et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result denotes that there is room to improve the accuracy of the first keyword list. Lane and Kawahara (2006) have proposed a method that incorporates not only “low‐level” information (e.g., linguistic likelihood) but also “high‐level” knowledge, i.e., discourse coherence measures. We are currently pursuing a method of estimation of speech intentions (Iwashita et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin et al (2001) gave preference to the domain selected in the previous turn by adding a certain score as an award when comparing the N-best candidates of the speech recognition for each domain. Lane and Kawahara (2005) also assigned a similar preference in the classification with Support Vector Machine (SVM). A system described in (O'Neill et al, 2004) does not change its domain until its sub-task is completed, which is a constraint similar to keeping dialogue in one domain.…”
Section: Extensible and Robust Domain Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, topic consistency is employed as a confidence measure for utterance verification [8], which is a measure of topic match between the input utterance and the application domain from the confidence vector of topic classificaCopyright c 2014 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers tion. Another example is topic adaptation for the language model of speech recognition [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%