1993
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560020916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of protein structures: Patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions

Abstract: A novel method for differentiating between correctly and incorrectly determined regions of protein structures based on characteristic atomic interactions is described. Different types of atoms are distributed nonrandomly with respect to each other in proteins. Errors in model building lead to more randomized distributions of the different atom types, which can be distinguished from correct distributions by statistical methods.Atoms are classified in one of three categories: carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and oxygen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
2,029
0
13

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,422 publications
(2,153 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
2,029
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, ligands were then transferred among target structures, keeping their orientation as a restraint for the subsequent modelling process. Subsequently, models were selected on the basis of high molpdf score and subjected to loop refinement and model validation using iterative evaluation of Ramachandran plot, ERRAT plot and ProSA Z-core (Colovos and Yeates, 1993;Lovell et al, 2003;Wiederstein and Sippl, 2007).…”
Section: Homology Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, ligands were then transferred among target structures, keeping their orientation as a restraint for the subsequent modelling process. Subsequently, models were selected on the basis of high molpdf score and subjected to loop refinement and model validation using iterative evaluation of Ramachandran plot, ERRAT plot and ProSA Z-core (Colovos and Yeates, 1993;Lovell et al, 2003;Wiederstein and Sippl, 2007).…”
Section: Homology Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Simulated annealing was performed in PHENIX. 43 The structure was validated using the programs PRO-CHECK (version 3.5.4), 44 ERRAT, 45 and VERI-FY_3D. 46 Although addition of NAD to the crystallization solution improved the size and quality of the crystals, no clear electron density was observed for NAD.…”
Section: Esi Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final model was assessed using the following structure assessment programs: Verify3D, ERRAT [30], PROCHECK [31], QMEAN [32]. …”
Section: Generation Of a 3d Model Of Cyp2j2mentioning
confidence: 99%