2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40615-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of Open Concurrent Object Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, the reason for that complication can be attributed to the more tighter coupling of objects in the multi-threaded setting. The general common-sense observation that loosely coupled systems entail a more compositional system description and especially simplify reasoning in a modular fashion is also exploited in Ahrendt and Dylla (2012), Din et al (2012) and Kurnia and Poetzsch-Heffter (2013) in the context of Hoare-style proof systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the reason for that complication can be attributed to the more tighter coupling of objects in the multi-threaded setting. The general common-sense observation that loosely coupled systems entail a more compositional system description and especially simplify reasoning in a modular fashion is also exploited in Ahrendt and Dylla (2012), Din et al (2012) and Kurnia and Poetzsch-Heffter (2013) in the context of Hoare-style proof systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%