1995
DOI: 10.1109/19.377845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of on-wafer noise parameter measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, we could choose to shift units around so that, for example, a a , b a , and c* were all dimensionless and e a had dimensions V/m, but for present purposes we shall use eqs (9) and (10). The remaining practical question is what is the physical significance or interpretation of f a , and how does one determine or measure it?…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Normalization and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned above, we could choose to shift units around so that, for example, a a , b a , and c* were all dimensionless and e a had dimensions V/m, but for present purposes we shall use eqs (9) and (10). The remaining practical question is what is the physical significance or interpretation of f a , and how does one determine or measure it?…”
Section: Theoretical Background 21 Normalization and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, if there is a single input impedance of interest, for example, 50 ft, then the noise figure can be measured at just that one impedance. A good deal of work has been done over the past several years to develop and improve techniques for measurement of noise figure on wafer [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Methods and even commercial systems exist for such measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when measurement uncertainty, or error, is taken into account, simulation shows that this Γ g circle is preferred having a large radius if the uncertainty is embedded in the measured T n , which is usually the case when measuring an ultra-sensitive transistor. Though it is convenient using the simulation approach to both determine the desired generator reflection coefficients and make an evaluation of different computation algorithms [20]- [23], this empirical approach cannot reveal much about the underlying physics, nor explains why the desired results can be rendered. In this paper, we intend to demonstrate that, through mathematical reasonings, several interesting conclusions can indeed be obtained without the running of numerous and laborious simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%