2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4983320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of long wavelength electromagnetic modes with a gyrokinetic-fluid hybrid model in the XGC code

Abstract: As an alternative option to kinetic electrons, the gyrokinetic total-f particle-in-cell (PIC) code XGC1 has been extended to the MHD/fluid type electromagnetic regime by combining gyrokinetic PIC ions with massless drift-fluid electrons analogous to Chen and Parker [Phys. Plasmas 8, 441 (2001)]. Two representative long wavelength modes, shear Alfvén waves and resistive tearing modes, are verified in cylindrical and toroidal magnetic field geometries.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although both GENE and XGC have been extensively and thoroughly benchmarked in various regimes (see, e.g., Refs. [9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]), there is not yet a direct comparison between these two codes. Moreover, previous benchmarks have used different sets of parameters, and thus even indirect comparisons are not possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although both GENE and XGC have been extensively and thoroughly benchmarked in various regimes (see, e.g., Refs. [9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]), there is not yet a direct comparison between these two codes. Moreover, previous benchmarks have used different sets of parameters, and thus even indirect comparisons are not possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this point, all published nonlinear electromagnetic gyrokinetic results have focused on the core region, mostly within the δf formulation neglecting the E nonlinearity, although the ORB5 PIC code includes the E nonlinearity and is effectively full-f (Lanti et al 2019). The XGC1 code is also full-f and is focused on both the core and the edge/SOL; it has an option for a gyrokinetic ion/drift-fluid massless electron hybrid model (Hager et al 2017), with a fully kinetic implicit electromagnetic scheme based on Chen & Chacon (2015) recently implemented and under further development (Ku et al 2018b). Other gyrokinetic codes working on the SOL are not yet electromagnetic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* mathewsa@mit.edu This is significant since validating the accuracy of reduced turbulence theories is amongst the greatest challenges to the advancement of plasma modelling. In the fusion community, both comprehensive full-f global gyrokinetic [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and two-fluid [14][15][16][17][18] direct numerical simulations are under active development to improve predictive modelling capabilities and the design of future reactors, but no single code can currently capture all the dynamics present in the edge with sufficient numerical realism. It is therefore of paramount importance to recognize when certain numerical or analytical simplifications make no discernible difference, or when a given theoretical assumption is too risky-to clearly identify the limits of present simulations [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%