2012
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2012.2201344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification Decoding of High-Rate LDPC Codes With Applications in Compressed Sensing

Abstract: This paper considers the performance of (j, k)-regular low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes with messagepassing (MP) decoding algorithms in the high-rate regime. In particular, we derive the high-rate scaling law for MP decoding of LDPC codes on the binary erasure channel (BEC) and the q-ary symmetric channel (q-SC). For the BEC and a fixed j, the density evolution (DE) threshold of iterative decoding scales like Θ(k −1 ) and the critical stopping ratio scales like Θ(k −j/(j−2) ). For the q-SC and a fixed j, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity and convenience of analysis, our work in this paper is based on the noiseless assumption. This is consistent with the nature of recovery process since LM1/LM2 methods cannot cope with noisy coefficients [4] [5]. Noisy extensions have been considered elsewhere [3] [14], however, we believe that there is a room for improvement in their simplicity and efficiency.…”
Section: Noise-resistance Feature Of Rateless Cssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For simplicity and convenience of analysis, our work in this paper is based on the noiseless assumption. This is consistent with the nature of recovery process since LM1/LM2 methods cannot cope with noisy coefficients [4] [5]. Noisy extensions have been considered elsewhere [3] [14], however, we believe that there is a room for improvement in their simplicity and efficiency.…”
Section: Noise-resistance Feature Of Rateless Cssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, CSBP is rather complex both from the analysis and implementation perspective, since the messages exchanged across factor graph represent continuous probability distributions. As lowcomplexity versions of CSBP amenable to rigorous analysis, VB decoding algorithms (such as LM1 and LM2) have been investigated in noiseless CS scenario in [4] [5]. Using the CS setup analogue to LDPC codes, in these works, codingtheoretic tools such as the density evolution (DE) and stopping set analysis are applied to assess the CS recovery performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class of message-passing algorithms, such as the approximate message-passing algorithm (AMP) presented in [13], are iterative thresholding algorithms. Other messagepassing algorithms exist in the literature such as list decoding and multiple-basis belief propagation [14], sparse matching pursuit [15], verification decoding [16] or interval-passing [8] that we present in the next section.…”
Section: Message-passing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, it was shown that the IPA is a good complexity/performance trade-off between LP reconstruction and simple verification decoding [16]. The IPA is an iterative algorithm.…”
Section: The Interval-passing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that even though our analysis involves a rigorous density evolution argument, our decoder is always the basis pursuit linear relaxation which is substantially different from the related work on message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing [15], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%