2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification and validation of numerical modelling of DTMB 5415 roll decay

Abstract: The paper presents a numerical roll damping assessment of the intact DTMB 5415 naval ship at zero speed. Free model motions from four experimental roll decays with initial heeling angle of 4.0, 13.5, 19.58 and 24.50 deg, performed previously at the University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, have been analysed and the one with 19.58 deg initial heeling has been chosen for the Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) analysis. All calculations are performed using CD Adapco Star CCM+ software investigating the accuracy and eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time-step uncertainties as a percentage of timestep 1 (T1), for roll, pitch and heave RMS are, 7.00%, 7.41%, and 1.21%, respectively as shown in Table 5. Mancini et al (2018) also applied CF and GCI verification procedures on CFD modeling of DTMB5415 roll decay for a scaled model. In their work, roll motion grid uncertainty is 16.99% and time-step uncertainty is 0.88%.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-step uncertainties as a percentage of timestep 1 (T1), for roll, pitch and heave RMS are, 7.00%, 7.41%, and 1.21%, respectively as shown in Table 5. Mancini et al (2018) also applied CF and GCI verification procedures on CFD modeling of DTMB5415 roll decay for a scaled model. In their work, roll motion grid uncertainty is 16.99% and time-step uncertainty is 0.88%.…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface mentioned here is the surface of the cylinder block. According to the Mancini et al [29], Handschel et al [30], and the available ITTC recommended procedure and guidelines [31], the dimensions of the background region and the overset region are summarized in Table 3. The background region is usually designed in compliance with the "Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Application" [31].…”
Section: Simulation Domain and Physical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wall function approach is used for the near-wall treatment, in particular, the All wall Y + model. This approach is formulated to assure reasonable answers for meshes of intermediate resolution and is considered as the best compromise between description of the boundary layer with acceptable quality and the time required for the calculation [29]. The wall y + is a non-dimensional distance similar to the local Reynolds number, often used in CFD to describe how coarse or fine a mesh is for a particular flow [38].…”
Section: Near-wall Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After comprehensive consideration of previous research results [23,24] and the case of the KRISO Container Ship (KCS) with a rudder [25], the appropriate boundary types and solver settings in this paper are concluded in Table 4. By default, prism layers are not created for inlet, outlet, and symmetry boundaries.…”
Section: Numerical Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%