2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-010-0032-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification and fine-mapping of QTLs conferring days to flowering in soybean using residual heterozygous lines

Abstract: The results of QTL mapping based on a primary mapping population should be further verified and refined for its real utilization in marker-assisted selection or map-based cloning. The primary mapping population contains 114 BC 1 F 1 plants of the backcross between Essex (maturity group V, MG V) as the donor parent and ZDD2315 (MG II) as the recurrent parent. In this study, a genetic linkage map with 250 SSR markers spanning a total length of 2963.5 cM on 25 linkage groups (LG) was constructed using software MA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the D2 and E linkage groups, reported maturity-related QTLs were distributed across 18 additional linkage groups, predominantly the C2, L, and M linkage groups. Fine mapping and map-based cloning have been conducted for some QTLs (Yamanaka et al, 2005;Watanabe et al, 2009;Su et al, 2010). There are fewer studies on soybean branch trait loci, and the genetic contribution ratios of mapped soybean branch-related QTLs is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the D2 and E linkage groups, reported maturity-related QTLs were distributed across 18 additional linkage groups, predominantly the C2, L, and M linkage groups. Fine mapping and map-based cloning have been conducted for some QTLs (Yamanaka et al, 2005;Watanabe et al, 2009;Su et al, 2010). There are fewer studies on soybean branch trait loci, and the genetic contribution ratios of mapped soybean branch-related QTLs is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the mapping method also intimately affects the mapping results, and an inappropriate mapping method may result in erroneous judgment or false-positive (Su et al, 2010a). Composite interval mapping (CIM) and multiple QTL mapping (MQM) are suitable to detect QTLs when the data fit the genetic model of y = μ + a 1 + e, and multiple interval mapping with regression forward selection (MIMR), multiple interval mapping with forward search (MIMF) and inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) are suitable to detect QTLs when the data fit the genetic models of y = μ + a 1 + e and y = μ + a 1 + a 1 + a 1 a 2 + e, while composite interval mapping based on mixed linear model (MCIM) fits all models (Su et al, 2010b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QTL analysis has proven to be a powerful approach for novel gene and pathway discovery, especially for complex traits [15]. In the last decade, numerous disease-associated genetic components, such as HDL cholesterol [16−20] and hypertension [21] were successfully identified in mice using QTL mapping strategies.…”
Section: Mapping Results Associated With Genetic Modifiers Of the Scamentioning
confidence: 99%