Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
Citation Types
0
1
0
Year Published
2023
2023
Publication Types
Select...
1
Relationship
0
1
Authors
Journals
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
References 0 publications
0
1
0
“…In a recent study evaluating different cross‐matching methods in comparison to a conventional tube method, the antiglobulin‐enhanced gel tube method showed concordant results in all (10/10) compatible cross‐match tests, in 6 of 10 tests with a mild microscopic agglutination, and in all (20/20) tests with a macroscopic agglutination. 5 In human medicine the different cross‐matching techniques seem to be of varying sensitivity detecting different alloantibodies. It is assumed that no method will detect all antibodies of clinical relevance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study evaluating different cross‐matching methods in comparison to a conventional tube method, the antiglobulin‐enhanced gel tube method showed concordant results in all (10/10) compatible cross‐match tests, in 6 of 10 tests with a mild microscopic agglutination, and in all (20/20) tests with a macroscopic agglutination. 5 In human medicine the different cross‐matching techniques seem to be of varying sensitivity detecting different alloantibodies. It is assumed that no method will detect all antibodies of clinical relevance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
