Verdere validering van de Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en vergelijking van twee Nederlandstalige versies

Engelen, Ute; Peuter, Steven De; Victoir, An; Diest, Ilse Van; Bergh, Omer Van den

doi:10.1007/bf03087979

Cited by 96 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The PANAS consists of 20 positive and negative adjectives for which participants had to indicate on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ( not at all ) to 5 ( very much ) to which extent they felt that way in general (trait) or now (state). Good reliability and validity have been reported (Engelen, De Peuter, Victoir, Van Diest, & Van den Bergh, 2006; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Was it so bad? The role of retrospective memory in symptom reporting.

Walentynowicz¹,

Bogaerts²,

Diest³

et al. 2015

Health Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Was it so bad? The role of retrospective memory in symptom reporting.

Walentynowicz¹,

Bogaerts²,

Diest³

et al. 2015

Health Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, the Catastrophizing about Asthma Scale was developed (CAS) with two scales: one assessing catastrophic thinking about asthma during asthma exacerbations (the exacerbation scale); the other assessing catastrophic thinking about asthma in daily life, whenever no exacerbation is present (the general scale; De . Data collected with this instrument support a link between illness-specific catastrophic thinking during exacerbations and overperception in patients with asthma (De Peuter, Lemaigre, Van Diest, Verleden, Demedts, & Van den Bergh, 2006).…”

mentioning

confidence: 70%

“…The validated Dutch version of the NA scale of the trait version of the PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; Engelen, De Peuter, Victoir, Van Diest, & Van den Bergh, 2006; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) was used to assess NA as a personality trait. Participants rate the degree to which 10 positive and 10 negative adjectives are applicable to themselves.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Illness-specific catastrophic thinking and overperception in asthma.

Peuter¹,

Lemaigre²,

Diest³

et al. 2008

Health Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The affective experiences while coaching or participating in sport of coaches and athletes, respectively, were measured via the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) [ 39 ]. A Dutch translation of the original scale was made and validated in prior research [ 40 ]. The PANAS includes two scales which distinguish positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

When You Can’t Play Sports: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Motivational and Emotional Experiences in Coach-Athlete Dyads

Fonteyn

Loeys

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background: This study aimed to assess the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on athletes’ and coaches’ experiences. Following the Dualistic Model of Passion and the Self-determination Theory, the objectives of this study were to investigate whether the COVID-19 pandemic and its restrictions affected athletes’ and coaches’ passion experiences, emotional experiences and basic psychological needs while engaging in their sport activities. Furthermore, the relationship between passion and emotional experiences as well as between passion and the basic psychological needs were explored; (2) Methods: 87 coach-athlete dyads, active at the recreational or competitive level in an individual sport, participated in the study. Using a cross-sectional dyadic design, athletes and coaches reported separately on their passion experience, emotional experiences and basic psychological needs in the previous two weeks; (3) Results: In total, 30 dyads were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, while 57 were not. Athletes’ obsessive passion as well coaches’ negative affect were larger in impacted dyads, while athletes’ positive affect was lower in that group compared to the not-impacted group. Moderated Actor–Partner Interdependence Models revealed that coaches’ obsessive passion was more strongly related to their negative affect in coach–athlete dyads that were not impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic than in dyads that were impacted. Furthermore, the harmonious passion of coaches was more strongly associated with athletes’ need satisfaction and need frustration in impacted dyads, while also the athletes’ harmonious passion in impacted dyads was more strongly associated with coaches’ need satisfaction; (4) Conclusions: Less positive outcomes and more negative outcomes were observed in both athletes and coaches that were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. On the other hand, the COVID-19 pandemic may have suppressed the negative effects of coaches’ obsessive passion on their negative affect, but strengthened the positive impact of coaches’ harmonious passion on the athletes’ need satisfaction and vice versa.

show abstract

Verdere validering van de Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) en vergelijking van twee Nederlandstalige versies

Cited by 96 publications

References 21 publications

Was it so bad? The role of retrospective memory in symptom reporting.

Was it so bad? The role of retrospective memory in symptom reporting.

Illness-specific catastrophic thinking and overperception in asthma.

When You Can’t Play Sports: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Motivational and Emotional Experiences in Coach-Athlete Dyads

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About